Core Concepts in Pharmacoepidemiology: New‐User Designs

In this article, we review the history and key reasons for new-user comparisons in pharmacoepidemiology, highlighting the target trial framework as a unifying framework. We describe three distinct pharmacoepidemiological new-user study designs: (1) new-user versus non-user; (2) active comparator new-user; (i.e., ACNU) and (3) prevalent new-user (i.e., PNU) designs, and discuss how each relates to key issues of defining time zero, choosing appropriate comparator groups, and potential sources of bias they do and do not account for. We use a clinical example of hormone replacement therapy and the risk of coronary heart disease to illustrate practical considerations surrounding the application of the three designs presented.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2024-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/hrb1-9y22
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Core Concepts in Pharmacoepidemiology: New‐User Designs

John Tazare, Michael Webster‐Clark, Jessica C. Young, Qoua L. Her et al.
UNC Libraries
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
article

Core Concepts in Pharmacoepidemiology: New‐User Designs

John Tazare, Michael Webster‐Clark, Jessica C. Young, Qoua L. Her, Julie Rouette
article en

Abstract

In this article, we review the history and key reasons for new-user comparisons in pharmacoepidemiology, highlighting the target trial framework as a unifying framework. We describe three distinct pharmacoepidemiological new-user study designs: (1) new-user versus non-user; (2) active comparator new-user; (i.e., ACNU) and (3) prevalent new-user (i.e., PNU) designs, and discuss how each relates to key issues of defining time zero, choosing appropriate comparator groups, and potential sources of bias they do and do not account for. We use a clinical example of hormone replacement therapy and the risk of coronary heart disease to illustrate practical considerations surrounding the application of the three designs presented.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Wellcome Trust, National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Core Concepts in Pharmacoepidemiology: New‐User Designs — John Tazare, Michael Webster‐Clark, et al. · UNC Libraries (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS