Government Audit Announcements and Analysts’ Earning Forecasts: Evidence From China

This paper uses the difference-in-difference (DID) method to test the impact of government audits on analysts’ forecast accuracy. The empirical results show that after government audit announcements, analysts’ earning forecast accuracy of listed companies controlled by audited state-owned enterprises is significantly improved, while optimistic forecast bias and stock recommendation ratings are significantly lowered. Among them, the impact of operation and management issues on analysts’ forecast accuracy is more significant, while the impact of financial and accounting issues on analysts’ stock recommendation ratings is more significant. These indicate that government audit announcements have information effect and transmits companies’ incremental information to capital market. The conclusions pass the sensitivity tests and robustness tests. This paper not only enriches the literature on the relationship between government behavior and capital market, but also provides empirical support for the impact of government regulation on capital market efficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAGE Open
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241255236
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.95
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Government Audit Announcements and Analysts’ Earning Forecasts: Evidence From China

Jia Li
1 citations
SAGE Open
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
0.95
article

Government Audit Announcements and Analysts’ Earning Forecasts: Evidence From China

Jia Li
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper uses the difference-in-difference (DID) method to test the impact of government audits on analysts’ forecast accuracy. The empirical results show that after government audit announcements, analysts’ earning forecast accuracy of listed companies controlled by audited state-owned enterprises is significantly improved, while optimistic forecast bias and stock recommendation ratings are significantly lowered. Among them, the impact of operation and management issues on analysts’ forecast accuracy is more significant, while the impact of financial and accounting issues on analysts’ stock recommendation ratings is more significant. These indicate that government audit announcements have information effect and transmits companies’ incremental information to capital market. The conclusions pass the sensitivity tests and robustness tests. This paper not only enriches the literature on the relationship between government behavior and capital market, but also provides empirical support for the impact of government regulation on capital market efficiency.

SAGE OpenVol. 14(4)
Tongling University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
0.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.