Differences in phenology between non‐native <scp>C4</scp> grasses and native <scp>C3</scp> and <scp>C4</scp> grasses in a seasonally dry ecosystem

Abstract Plant species phenology is an important driver of invasions in seasonal climates. The phenology of non‐natives is generally uncoupled from that of native species. Grasses cover a large proportion of the land surface and are important invaders around the world. Interestingly, the phenology of native and non‐native grasses could be modulated by the different metabolic pathways. We aimed to compare the vegetative and reproductive phenology of invasive C₄ grasses with that of coexisting native C₃ and C₄ grasses and to explore the relationship between phenology and climate. We recorded the onset, duration and synchronicity of vegetative and reproductive phenology (flowering and fruiting) during 1 year. Native C₃ grasses had 50% of their above‐ground biomass green earlier and remained in that state for a longer period than non‐native and native C₄ grasses. Flowering and fruiting occurred earlier in non‐native C₄ grasses than in native C₄ grasses. The flowering period was longer in non‐native C₄ than in native C₃ and C₄, with the non‐native Melinis repens (Poaceae), a highly invasive species worldwide, accounting for most of the difference. Non‐native C₄ tended to exhibit a lower flowering and fruiting synchrony than both native C₃ and C₄ species. Finally, reproductive and vegetative phenology was positively associated with temperature, while precipitation was mostly associated with C₄ species. The uncoupled vegetative phenology observed could be related to differences in metabolism among the studied species, while the uncoupled reproduction between non‐native and native C₄ grasses could be due to an advantage in resource use by non‐native species. Our work provides the first insight into the possible role of the species origin and metabolic pathways in the vegetative and reproductive phenology of invasive non‐native C₄ and native C₃ and C₄ grasses. Finally, we suggest future directions to elucidate these processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Austral Ecology
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/aec.70017
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.38

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differences in phenology between non‐native C4 grasses and native C3 and C4 grasses in a seasonally dry ecosystem

Melisa A. Giorgis, Ana E. Ferreras, Martín Pereyra Almena
2 citations
Austral Ecology
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
1.38
article

Differences in phenology between non‐native C4 grasses and native C3 and C4 grasses in a seasonally dry ecosystem

Melisa A. Giorgis, Ana E. Ferreras, Martín Pereyra Almena
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Plant species phenology is an important driver of invasions in seasonal climates. The phenology of non‐natives is generally uncoupled from that of native species. Grasses cover a large proportion of the land surface and are important invaders around the world. Interestingly, the phenology of native and non‐native grasses could be modulated by the different metabolic pathways. We aimed to compare the vegetative and reproductive phenology of invasive C₄ grasses with that of coexisting native C₃ and C₄ grasses and to explore the relationship between phenology and climate. We recorded the onset, duration and synchronicity of vegetative and reproductive phenology (flowering and fruiting) during 1 year. Native C₃ grasses had 50% of their above‐ground biomass green earlier and remained in that state for a longer period than non‐native and native C₄ grasses. Flowering and fruiting occurred earlier in non‐native C₄ grasses than in native C₄ grasses. The flowering period was longer in non‐native C₄ than in native C₃ and C₄, with the non‐native Melinis repens (Poaceae), a highly invasive species worldwide, accounting for most of the difference. Non‐native C₄ tended to exhibit a lower flowering and fruiting synchrony than both native C₃ and C₄ species. Finally, reproductive and vegetative phenology was positively associated with temperature, while precipitation was mostly associated with C₄ species. The uncoupled vegetative phenology observed could be related to differences in metabolism among the studied species, while the uncoupled reproduction between non‐native and native C₄ grasses could be due to an advantage in resource use by non‐native species. Our work provides the first insight into the possible role of the species origin and metabolic pathways in the vegetative and reproductive phenology of invasive non‐native C₄ and native C₃ and C₄ grasses. Finally, we suggest future directions to elucidate these processes.

Austral EcologyVol. 49(12)
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba (AR), Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal (AR)
Neotropical Grassland Conservancy
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
1.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.