Engineer CEOs and corporate investment efficiency

Purpose This paper aims to examine whether CEOs with an engineering background increase corporate investment efficiency (CIE). The authors further investigate the role of engineering directors on boards of the above association. Design/methodology/approach Drawing from upper-echelon theory, which suggests that corporate outcomes are a reflection of its top management characteristics, the authors hypothesise a positive association between engineer CEOs and CIE and a positive moderation role of the proportion of engineer directors on boards in the above association. The authors examine this link using a sample of Australian Securities Exchange 200 firms from 2015 to 2022. Engineer CEO data is hand-collected from corporate annual report biographies and investment efficiency is a measure that captures whether the investments are maintained at optimal levels relative to industry-year benchmarks, following the approaches of Biddle et al. (2009), Chen et al. (2011) and the average values of both models. Findings The results indicate support for the hypotheses, revealing that firms managed by engineer CEOs have higher investment efficiency than their counterpart firms. This association is exacerbated in the presence of a higher proportion of engineer directors on boards. The results are robust to year and industry-fixed effects, propensity score matching, alternative measures of investment efficiency and robust standard errors. Our results also remain valid for an industry sub-sample using certain industries in which engineering expertise maybe more desirable (e.g. metals and mining). Research limitations/implications By showing that engineer CEOs are significantly associated with CIE, the authors contribute to upper-echelon literature examining the link between CEO characteristics and corporate outcomes, particularly, investment decision efficiency. The influence of engineering background on corporate outcomes is less examined in the literature; thus, the authors contribute to this thin literature. Originality/value The findings are informative to potential investors in evaluating firms’ investment efficiency before investing in firms. For example, firms with engineer CEOs are likely to maintain efficient investment levels in future years.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pacific Accounting Review
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/par-06-2024-0124
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Corporate Finance and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.84
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Engineer CEOs and corporate investment efficiency

Sahan T. M. Dissanayake, Ashesha Paveena Weerasinghe
3 citations
Pacific Accounting Review
Corporate Finance and Governance
2.84
article

Engineer CEOs and corporate investment efficiency

Sahan T. M. Dissanayake, Ashesha Paveena Weerasinghe
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to examine whether CEOs with an engineering background increase corporate investment efficiency (CIE). The authors further investigate the role of engineering directors on boards of the above association. Design/methodology/approach Drawing from upper-echelon theory, which suggests that corporate outcomes are a reflection of its top management characteristics, the authors hypothesise a positive association between engineer CEOs and CIE and a positive moderation role of the proportion of engineer directors on boards in the above association. The authors examine this link using a sample of Australian Securities Exchange 200 firms from 2015 to 2022. Engineer CEO data is hand-collected from corporate annual report biographies and investment efficiency is a measure that captures whether the investments are maintained at optimal levels relative to industry-year benchmarks, following the approaches of Biddle et al. (2009), Chen et al. (2011) and the average values of both models. Findings The results indicate support for the hypotheses, revealing that firms managed by engineer CEOs have higher investment efficiency than their counterpart firms. This association is exacerbated in the presence of a higher proportion of engineer directors on boards. The results are robust to year and industry-fixed effects, propensity score matching, alternative measures of investment efficiency and robust standard errors. Our results also remain valid for an industry sub-sample using certain industries in which engineering expertise maybe more desirable (e.g. metals and mining). Research limitations/implications By showing that engineer CEOs are significantly associated with CIE, the authors contribute to upper-echelon literature examining the link between CEO characteristics and corporate outcomes, particularly, investment decision efficiency. The influence of engineering background on corporate outcomes is less examined in the literature; thus, the authors contribute to this thin literature. Originality/value The findings are informative to potential investors in evaluating firms’ investment efficiency before investing in firms. For example, firms with engineer CEOs are likely to maintain efficient investment levels in future years.

Pacific Accounting ReviewVol. 37(1)
Queensland University of Technology (AU), Rajarata University of Sri Lanka (LK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Corporate Finance and Governance
2.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.