(When) Do Parties Affect Economic Inequality? A Systematic Analysis of 30 Years of Research

Despite 30 years of research on economic inequality, the question of whether government ideology affects inequality remains unresolved. As rising inequality poses a major challenge to contemporary democracies, we ask: (when) do parties matter regarding inequality? Our systematic analysis finds that research is divided, with a tendency toward a pessimistic “no.” We decipher the factors that account for this split in theoretically predictable ways. We assess the roles played by the type of inequality, the time horizon, and the impact of policy channels. Bivariate and multivariate analyses of 393 TSCS-regression findings show how the type of inequality and a neglect of top incomes, a focus on short- rather than long-term effects, and the inclusion of policy channels that absorb the effects of parties strongly codetermine the results. Effects septuple depending on how these factors are combined. We draw three lessons that, when combined, foster a shift toward a more optimistic perspective on the latitude of politics.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Perspectives on Politics
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592724001786
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

(When) Do Parties Affect Economic Inequality? A Systematic Analysis of 30 Years of Research

Martin Haselmayer, Alexander Horn
2 citations
Perspectives on Politics
Social Policy and Reform Studies
4.46
article

(When) Do Parties Affect Economic Inequality? A Systematic Analysis of 30 Years of Research

Martin Haselmayer, Alexander Horn
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Despite 30 years of research on economic inequality, the question of whether government ideology affects inequality remains unresolved. As rising inequality poses a major challenge to contemporary democracies, we ask: (when) do parties matter regarding inequality? Our systematic analysis finds that research is divided, with a tendency toward a pessimistic “no.” We decipher the factors that account for this split in theoretically predictable ways. We assess the roles played by the type of inequality, the time horizon, and the impact of policy channels. Bivariate and multivariate analyses of 393 TSCS-regression findings show how the type of inequality and a neglect of top incomes, a focus on short- rather than long-term effects, and the inclusion of policy channels that absorb the effects of parties strongly codetermine the results. Effects septuple depending on how these factors are combined. We draw three lessons that, when combined, foster a shift toward a more optimistic perspective on the latitude of politics.

Perspectives on PoliticsVol. 23(3)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
4.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

(When) Do Parties Affect Economic Inequality? A Systematic Analysis of 30 Years of Research — Martin Haselmayer, Alexander Horn · Perspectives on Politics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS