Climate extremes and risks: links between climate science and decision-making

The World Climate Research Programme (WCRP) envisions a future where actionable climate information is universally accessible, supporting decision makers in preparing for and responding to climate change. In this perspective, we advocate for enhancing links between climate science and decision-making through a better and more decision-relevant understanding of climate impacts. The proposed framework comprises three pillars: climate science, impact science, and decision-making, focusing on generating seamless climate information from sub-seasonal, seasonal, decadal to century timescales informed by observed climate events and their impacts. The link between climate science and decision-making has strengthened in recent years, partly owing to undeniable impacts arising from disastrous weather extremes. Enhancing decision-relevant understanding involves utilizing lessons from past extreme events and implementing impact-based early warning systems to improve resilience. Integrated risk assessment and management require a comprehensive approach that encompasses good knowledge about possible impacts, hazard identification, monitoring, and communication of risks while acknowledging uncertainties inherent in climate predictions and projections, but not letting the uncertainty lead to decision paralysis. The importance of data accessibility, especially in the Global South, underscores the need for better coordination and resource allocation. Strategic frameworks should aim to enhance impact-related and open-access climate services around the world. Continuous improvements in predictive modeling and observational data are critical, as is ensuring that climate science remains relevant to decision makers locally and globally. Ultimately, fostering stronger collaborations and dedicated investments to process and tailor climate data will enhance societal preparedness, enabling communities to navigate the complexities of a changing climate effectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Climate
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2024.1499765
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.98

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Climate extremes and risks: links between climate science and decision-making

Marjolijn Haasnoot, Lisa V. Alexander, Shampa Shampa, Jana Sillmann et al.
7 citations
Frontiers in Climate
Climate variability and models
1.98
article

Climate extremes and risks: links between climate science and decision-making

Marjolijn Haasnoot, Lisa V. Alexander, Shampa Shampa, Jana Sillmann, Kirsten L. Findell, Carlo Buontempo, Tannecia S. Stephenson, Christian L. E. Franzke, Monica Ainhorn Morrison, Alex C. Ruane, Markus G. Donat, Douglas Maraun, Daniela Jacob, Tim Raupach, Bin Guan, Erich Markus Fischer, Leonard Borchert, Ed Hawkins, Lincoln Muniz Alves, Benjamin Poschlod, Pablo Borges de Amorim, Narelle van der Wel, Roché Mahon, Xuebin Zhang, Zhuo Wang, Josipa Županić
article en
7 citations

Abstract

The World Climate Research Programme (WCRP) envisions a future where actionable climate information is universally accessible, supporting decision makers in preparing for and responding to climate change. In this perspective, we advocate for enhancing links between climate science and decision-making through a better and more decision-relevant understanding of climate impacts. The proposed framework comprises three pillars: climate science, impact science, and decision-making, focusing on generating seamless climate information from sub-seasonal, seasonal, decadal to century timescales informed by observed climate events and their impacts. The link between climate science and decision-making has strengthened in recent years, partly owing to undeniable impacts arising from disastrous weather extremes. Enhancing decision-relevant understanding involves utilizing lessons from past extreme events and implementing impact-based early warning systems to improve resilience. Integrated risk assessment and management require a comprehensive approach that encompasses good knowledge about possible impacts, hazard identification, monitoring, and communication of risks while acknowledging uncertainties inherent in climate predictions and projections, but not letting the uncertainty lead to decision paralysis. The importance of data accessibility, especially in the Global South, underscores the need for better coordination and resource allocation. Strategic frameworks should aim to enhance impact-related and open-access climate services around the world. Continuous improvements in predictive modeling and observational data are critical, as is ensuring that climate science remains relevant to decision makers locally and globally. Ultimately, fostering stronger collaborations and dedicated investments to process and tailor climate data will enhance societal preparedness, enabling communities to navigate the complexities of a changing climate effectively.

Frontiers in ClimateVol. 6
NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US), Goddard Institute for Space Studies (US), Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES), World Meteorological Organization (CH), University of Graz (AT), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Universität Hamburg (DE), Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BD), NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (US), Utrecht University (NL), University of Victoria (CA), Barcelona Supercomputing Center (ES), German Climate Computing Centre (DE), UNSW Sydney (AU), ETH Zurich (CH), Pacific Institute for Climate Solutions (CA), Deltares (NL), Institute for Basic Science (KR), CICERO Center for International Climate Research (NO), National Centre for Atmospheric Science (GB), ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate System Science (AU), Caribbean Disaster Emergency Management Agency (BB), NSF NCAR Climate and Global Dynamics Laboratory (US), Climate Service Center, World Climate Research Programme (CH), Pusan National University (KR), University of Reading (GB), Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (BR), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (ES)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Sight Research UK, European Commission, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Universität Hamburg, Institute for Basic Science, Earth Sciences Division, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme, Natural Environment Research Council
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Climate variability and models
1.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.