Mineral-ecological cropping systems mitigate biodiversity-productivity trade-offs of the organic vs. conventional farming dichotomy
Abstract Conventional agriculture significantly reduces biodiversity, while organic farming promotes it, but often yields half as much. Addressing this biodiversity-productivity trade-off is crucial for future agriculture. Mineral-ecological cropping systems (MECS) have been suggested as an alternative, blending organic and conventional methods by avoiding chemical-synthetic pesticides and using mineral fertilizers. In a German experiment with 168 parcels, we compared MECS, conventional, and organic systems in terms of ecological and economic performance. Arthropod diversity was measured through standardized species collections and DNA-metabarcoding. Productivity was assessed via yields and economic profits. MECS showed similar arthropod diversity to other farming systems, achieved 90% of conventional crop yields, and produced 1.8 times of the organic yield. Profits from MECS were on average 37% higher than the conventional system with a short wheat-maize-soy crop rotation. Further farm-level studies are needed, but MECS could be a reasonable alternative to both organic and conventional farming and can mitigate biodiversity-productivity trade-offs.
Authors
- Enno Bahrs (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5687-0772)
- Jérôme Morinière (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9167-6409)
- Ingo Graß (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7788-1940)
- T. Köhler (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4654-3241)
- Felix Witte (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6396-0178)
- Christian Sponagel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4637-4916)
- Marit Kinga Kasten
Institutions
- University of Hohenheim (DE)
- Stifterverband (DE)
- ABX-CRO Advanced Pharmaceutical Services (Germany) (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- npj Sustainable Agriculture
- Published
- 2024-12-18
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s44264-024-00034-0
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.34
Funders
- Universität Hohenheim
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung