公共健康倫理思考

LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract also in English. 公共健康倫理的溯源既不是醫學倫理學,也不是生命倫理學。本文從公共健康倫理發展遲緩這一現象入手,提出若真正理解公共健康倫理便需要真正理解公共衛生的特點和本質以及在公共衛生干預措施方面實踐公共健康倫理念。要概述一個令人滿意的公共健康倫理學理論還有困難,其核心價值群還需要補充和完善,以建立實質性公共健康倫理的基礎,例如需要準確界定群體、社區、人口、公共物品、共同利益、團結、互惠、福利、福祉和正義等概念和核心價值群,並從中西方不同的哲學倫理學視角進行比較研究。 Trace to the source of public health ethics is neither medical ethics nor bioethics. This paper begins by exploring the slow development of public health ethics and argues that a true understanding of public health ethics requires not only an understanding of public health itself, but also the inclusion of perspectives from the philosophy of public health, health economics and even political philosophy. Only then can we gain a deeper understanding of the characteristics and essence of public health, which in turn will help to highlight the ethical issues involved in public health interventions and public health ethics practice. It remains difficult to outline a satisfactory theory of public health ethics; however, the path to consensus requires a foundation of the core values of public health ethics. For instance, it is necessary to precisely define concepts such as groups, communities, populations, public goods, common interests, solidarity, reciprocity, welfare, well-being and justice. A comparative study of Eastern and Western philosophical and ethical perspectives would help us to gain a more profound understanding of these issues.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24112/ijccpm.222869
Primary Topic
Public Health Policies and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

公共健康倫理思考

亞麗 叢
International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine
Public Health Policies and Education
article

公共健康倫理思考

亞麗 叢
article en

Abstract

LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract also in English. 公共健康倫理的溯源既不是醫學倫理學,也不是生命倫理學。本文從公共健康倫理發展遲緩這一現象入手,提出若真正理解公共健康倫理便需要真正理解公共衛生的特點和本質以及在公共衛生干預措施方面實踐公共健康倫理念。要概述一個令人滿意的公共健康倫理學理論還有困難,其核心價值群還需要補充和完善,以建立實質性公共健康倫理的基礎,例如需要準確界定群體、社區、人口、公共物品、共同利益、團結、互惠、福利、福祉和正義等概念和核心價值群,並從中西方不同的哲學倫理學視角進行比較研究。 Trace to the source of public health ethics is neither medical ethics nor bioethics. This paper begins by exploring the slow development of public health ethics and argues that a true understanding of public health ethics requires not only an understanding of public health itself, but also the inclusion of perspectives from the philosophy of public health, health economics and even political philosophy. Only then can we gain a deeper understanding of the characteristics and essence of public health, which in turn will help to highlight the ethical issues involved in public health interventions and public health ethics practice. It remains difficult to outline a satisfactory theory of public health ethics; however, the path to consensus requires a foundation of the core values of public health ethics. For instance, it is necessary to precisely define concepts such as groups, communities, populations, public goods, common interests, solidarity, reciprocity, welfare, well-being and justice. A comparative study of Eastern and Western philosophical and ethical perspectives would help us to gain a more profound understanding of these issues.

International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of MedicineVol. 22(2)
Peking University (CN), Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Public Health Policies and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.