Emotion Regulation Difficulties as a Mediator Between Relationship Satisfaction Predicting Depressive Symptom Trajectories Among Couples in Couple Therapy

Although adults with depression struggle to effectively emotionally regulate themselves, these findings are limited to one partner in a romantic relationship, community samples, and cross-sectional designs. Hence, we aimed to address these gaps in the literature by investigating emotion regulation difficulties as a predictor of change in depression among couples in couple therapy. Additionally, we aimed to investigate whether emotion regulation difficulties mediated the well-established association between relationship satisfaction and changes in depression of couples in couple therapy. We examined 484 different-sex couples in couple therapy from the Marriage and Family Therapy Practice Research Network-a clinical dataset from clinics across the United States. Dyadic latent growth models revealed the actor and partner effects of emotion regulation difficulties at session 1, predicting decreases in depression trajectories across 16 sessions of couple therapy. Additionally, dyadic latent growth mediation models revealed that emotion regulation difficulties at session four did not mediate the associations between relationship satisfaction at session 1 with depression trajectories of sessions eight through 16. For couple therapy clinicians, emotion regulation difficulties can play a direct role in the treatment of depression. However, our results did not support emotion regulation difficulties as a mediator for the well-established association between relationship satisfaction and depression trajectories.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Sciences
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14121215
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.29

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Emotion Regulation Difficulties as a Mediator Between Relationship Satisfaction Predicting Depressive Symptom Trajectories Among Couples in Couple Therapy

Andrea K. Wittenborn, Preston C. Morgan, Ryan Snyder, Garrin L. Morlan
2 citations
Behavioral Sciences
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
1.29
article

Emotion Regulation Difficulties as a Mediator Between Relationship Satisfaction Predicting Depressive Symptom Trajectories Among Couples in Couple Therapy

Andrea K. Wittenborn, Preston C. Morgan, Ryan Snyder, Garrin L. Morlan
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Although adults with depression struggle to effectively emotionally regulate themselves, these findings are limited to one partner in a romantic relationship, community samples, and cross-sectional designs. Hence, we aimed to address these gaps in the literature by investigating emotion regulation difficulties as a predictor of change in depression among couples in couple therapy. Additionally, we aimed to investigate whether emotion regulation difficulties mediated the well-established association between relationship satisfaction and changes in depression of couples in couple therapy. We examined 484 different-sex couples in couple therapy from the Marriage and Family Therapy Practice Research Network-a clinical dataset from clinics across the United States. Dyadic latent growth models revealed the actor and partner effects of emotion regulation difficulties at session 1, predicting decreases in depression trajectories across 16 sessions of couple therapy. Additionally, dyadic latent growth mediation models revealed that emotion regulation difficulties at session four did not mediate the associations between relationship satisfaction at session 1 with depression trajectories of sessions eight through 16. For couple therapy clinicians, emotion regulation difficulties can play a direct role in the treatment of depression. However, our results did not support emotion regulation difficulties as a mediator for the well-established association between relationship satisfaction and depression trajectories.

Behavioral SciencesVol. 14(12)
Oklahoma State University (US), Michigan State University (US)
Oklahoma State University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
1.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.