Exploring the subjective experience of researchers and co-researchers with lived experience of psychosis high risk states: a qualitative analysis within a participatory research process

The analysis of the anonymous reflection reports on a participatory research project indicates that there was a positive collaboration between participants with and without lived experience of psychosis high risk states, wherein they were able to interact on an equal footing. Participants reported an experience of equal cooperation and gained relevant personal insights from project participation. Although we do not have clear evidence of experiences of power imbalances or perceived hierarchies based on the analysed reports, these cannot be ruled out and have to be addressed in future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Psychiatry
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-024-06367-x
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the subjective experience of researchers and co-researchers with lived experience of psychosis high risk states: a qualitative analysis within a participatory research process

Raphaela E. Kaisler, Zsuzsa Litvan, Fabian Friedrich, Josef Baumgärtner et al.
2 citations
BMC Psychiatry
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
1.70
article

Exploring the subjective experience of researchers and co-researchers with lived experience of psychosis high risk states: a qualitative analysis within a participatory research process

Raphaela E. Kaisler, Zsuzsa Litvan, Fabian Friedrich, Josef Baumgärtner, Alexander Kaltenboeck, Melanie Trimmel, Barbara Hinterbuchinger, Nilufar Mossaheb, Antonia Renner
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The analysis of the anonymous reflection reports on a participatory research project indicates that there was a positive collaboration between participants with and without lived experience of psychosis high risk states, wherein they were able to interact on an equal footing. Participants reported an experience of equal cooperation and gained relevant personal insights from project participation. Although we do not have clear evidence of experiences of power imbalances or perceived hierarchies based on the analysed reports, these cannot be ruled out and have to be addressed in future research.

BMC PsychiatryVol. 24(1)
Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
1.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Exploring the subjective experience of researchers and co-researchers with lived experience of psychosis high risk states: a qualitative analysis within a participatory research process — Raphaela E. Kaisler, Zsuzsa Litvan, et al. · BMC Psychiatry (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS