The Sequence and Reconstructive Modality of Breast Cancer Treatments Affects Wait Times to Adjunctive Therapies in Patients Undergoing Mastectomy with Immediate Breast Reconstruction

<b>Introduction:</b> Breast cancer care requires both oncologists and plastic surgeons. Coordinating these specialists and combining extirpative and reconstructive procedures before adjunctive therapies can cause delays in care. For patients with less advanced disease, surgery is performed before adjunctive therapies, requiring early specialist coordination and the possibility of surgical complications. We compare these patients to those with more advanced disease requiring adjunctive therapies before surgery. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective chart review identified 337 post-mastectomy + immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) patients. Patients were divided into surgery first (SF) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) first groups with reconstructive subgroups. Wait times between care pathway milestones were compiled and compared to national standards. <b>Results:</b> SF experienced longer wait times from consultation to treatment initiation (47 ± 51.5 vs 22 ± 22, <i>P</i><.001) and from first to second treatment modality (62 ± 35 vs 39 ± 17, <i>P</i><.001). Furthermore, only 29% of SF met the standard of receiving treatment within 4 weeks from consultation compared to 63% of NC (<i>P</i><.001). Within subgroups, SF alloplastic reconstructions had shorter wait times compared to SF autologous reconstructions. For SF, only 31% of alloplastic and 24% of autologous reconstruction initiated treatment within 4 weeks of consultation. <b>Conclusion:</b> In this cohort of Canadian breast cancer patients, those receiving surgery first experienced prolonged wait times to treatment, particularly with autologous reconstruction. Patients should be informed of the potential impact on adjunctive therapies when considering reconstructive modality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plastic Surgery
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/22925503241301723
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Sequence and Reconstructive Modality of Breast Cancer Treatments Affects Wait Times to Adjunctive Therapies in Patients Undergoing Mastectomy with Immediate Breast Reconstruction

Kathryn V. Isaac, Sheina A. Macadam, Karanvir S. Raman, Maya Morton Ninomiya et al.
2 citations
Plastic Surgery
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
1.15
article

The Sequence and Reconstructive Modality of Breast Cancer Treatments Affects Wait Times to Adjunctive Therapies in Patients Undergoing Mastectomy with Immediate Breast Reconstruction

Kathryn V. Isaac, Sheina A. Macadam, Karanvir S. Raman, Maya Morton Ninomiya, Danielle Cohen, Christopher Doherty, Sarika Verma, Nancy Van Laeken, Esta S. Bovill
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Introduction:</b> Breast cancer care requires both oncologists and plastic surgeons. Coordinating these specialists and combining extirpative and reconstructive procedures before adjunctive therapies can cause delays in care. For patients with less advanced disease, surgery is performed before adjunctive therapies, requiring early specialist coordination and the possibility of surgical complications. We compare these patients to those with more advanced disease requiring adjunctive therapies before surgery. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective chart review identified 337 post-mastectomy + immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) patients. Patients were divided into surgery first (SF) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) first groups with reconstructive subgroups. Wait times between care pathway milestones were compiled and compared to national standards. <b>Results:</b> SF experienced longer wait times from consultation to treatment initiation (47 ± 51.5 vs 22 ± 22, <i>P</i><.001) and from first to second treatment modality (62 ± 35 vs 39 ± 17, <i>P</i><.001). Furthermore, only 29% of SF met the standard of receiving treatment within 4 weeks from consultation compared to 63% of NC (<i>P</i><.001). Within subgroups, SF alloplastic reconstructions had shorter wait times compared to SF autologous reconstructions. For SF, only 31% of alloplastic and 24% of autologous reconstruction initiated treatment within 4 weeks of consultation. <b>Conclusion:</b> In this cohort of Canadian breast cancer patients, those receiving surgery first experienced prolonged wait times to treatment, particularly with autologous reconstruction. Patients should be informed of the potential impact on adjunctive therapies when considering reconstructive modality.

Plastic SurgeryVol. 34(1)
University of British Columbia (CA), University of Waterloo (CA), McGill University (CA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.