Visualizing the Knowledge Domain of Research on Cognates: A Bibliometric Analysis

Cognates constitute an essential aspect of lexical processing, and numerous scholars have made significant contributions to studying their processing patterns, influential variables, and theoretical models. However, there has been a lack of systematic reviews that comprehensively examine the body of research on cognates, including their primary research topics, theories, findings, and future directions. The present study conducted a bibliometric analysis of the 726 recordings from 2001 to 2021 retrieved from the Web of Science database. The results revealed that: (1) studies on cognates were mainly conducted in countries using alphabetic languages; (2) cognate processing remains as the focus in the research domain; (3) cognate effect are modulated by factors at word, task, and participant level; (4) BIA+ model is widely used to account for cognate processing. The limitations and potential implications for future cognate research are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Humanities Research
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7080/2024.18909
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.34

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Visualizing the Knowledge Domain of Research on Cognates: A Bibliometric Analysis

Yu Wang, Junlong Cheng
1 citations
Advances in Humanities Research
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
0.34
article

Visualizing the Knowledge Domain of Research on Cognates: A Bibliometric Analysis

Yu Wang, Junlong Cheng
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Cognates constitute an essential aspect of lexical processing, and numerous scholars have made significant contributions to studying their processing patterns, influential variables, and theoretical models. However, there has been a lack of systematic reviews that comprehensively examine the body of research on cognates, including their primary research topics, theories, findings, and future directions. The present study conducted a bibliometric analysis of the 726 recordings from 2001 to 2021 retrieved from the Web of Science database. The results revealed that: (1) studies on cognates were mainly conducted in countries using alphabetic languages; (2) cognate processing remains as the focus in the research domain; (3) cognate effect are modulated by factors at word, task, and participant level; (4) BIA+ model is widely used to account for cognate processing. The limitations and potential implications for future cognate research are discussed.

Advances in Humanities ResearchVol. 10(1)
Beijing Foreign Studies University (CN), Tianjin University of Commerce (CN), Guizhou Education University (CN)
Beijing Foreign Studies University
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
0.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.