Aging, Choosing, … and Regretting

Abstract: This review examines how age-related differences in the experience of regrets relate to decision making with particular emphasis on memory-based and anticipatory processes. First, we summarize how reports of different types of regrets vary across the lifespan. For long-term/life regrets, older (vs. younger) adults tend to recall more intense and omission-based regrets, but not a higher number of regrets. For short-term/everyday regrets, older (vs. younger) adults tend to recall fewer and less intense regrets as well as similar or higher levels of decision satisfaction. For anticipated or future regrets, older adults are typically as accurate as younger adults in forecasting feelings, but they expect to experience lower levels of negative affect after missing out on desirable decision outcomes. Second, we link age-related differences in the experience of regrets to potential neural, cognitive, emotional, and motivational mechanisms. With respect to neural and cognitive processes, age-related cognitive changes may alter older adults’ ability to process regret-related information and to engage in counterfactual thinking. With respect to affect, older adults tend to attend more strongly to positive decision-relevant information and remember past decisions and experiences as more positively than they initially experienced them. Finally, with respect to motivation, older age is typically associated with a shift toward maintenance and loss prevention goals. In addition, older adults focus more on controlling their response to regrets rather than the regrettable decision itself. We conclude our review by identifying limitations of the extant literature and making suggestions for future research directions on the topic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Psychologist
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000534
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Aging and Gerontology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.08
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aging, Choosing, … and Regretting

Julia Nolte, Corinna E. Löckenhoff
3 citations
European Psychologist
Aging and Gerontology Research
3.08
article

Aging, Choosing, … and Regretting

Julia Nolte, Corinna E. Löckenhoff
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract: This review examines how age-related differences in the experience of regrets relate to decision making with particular emphasis on memory-based and anticipatory processes. First, we summarize how reports of different types of regrets vary across the lifespan. For long-term/life regrets, older (vs. younger) adults tend to recall more intense and omission-based regrets, but not a higher number of regrets. For short-term/everyday regrets, older (vs. younger) adults tend to recall fewer and less intense regrets as well as similar or higher levels of decision satisfaction. For anticipated or future regrets, older adults are typically as accurate as younger adults in forecasting feelings, but they expect to experience lower levels of negative affect after missing out on desirable decision outcomes. Second, we link age-related differences in the experience of regrets to potential neural, cognitive, emotional, and motivational mechanisms. With respect to neural and cognitive processes, age-related cognitive changes may alter older adults’ ability to process regret-related information and to engage in counterfactual thinking. With respect to affect, older adults tend to attend more strongly to positive decision-relevant information and remember past decisions and experiences as more positively than they initially experienced them. Finally, with respect to motivation, older age is typically associated with a shift toward maintenance and loss prevention goals. In addition, older adults focus more on controlling their response to regrets rather than the regrettable decision itself. We conclude our review by identifying limitations of the extant literature and making suggestions for future research directions on the topic.

European PsychologistVol. 29(4)
Tilburg University (NL), Cornell University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Aging and Gerontology Research
3.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Aging, Choosing, … and Regretting — Julia Nolte, Corinna E. Löckenhoff · European Psychologist (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS