Edible wild herbs and mushrooms of Tusheti (the eastern Greater Caucasus), Georgia

Background: Wild herbs were traditionally widely used in everyday diet of the population of alpine areas of Georgia. Ethnography has a long history of research in the country, and along with the results particularly intensified ethnobotanical and ethnomycological studies of the recent decades, it is interesting to synthesize the data scattered in the Georgian ethnographic sources, an attempt of which is the present paper. Methods: The review paper is based on the Georgian ethnographic literature sources deposited at the National Parliamentary Library of Georgia (NLPG). Literature searches were performed through the NLPG catalog (https://www.nplg.¬gov.ge/geo/Catalogues) with the major keyword “Tusheti”. Dictionaries of the Georgian language and specifically those of plant names were also consulted. Results: Seventy-three species and eight genera of vascular plants (the latter without particular species as only respective generic local names were found) mentioned in the ethnographic literature sources issues before recent ethnobotanical studies (Bussmann et al. 2016, 2017) as well as 26 species of mushrooms mostly revealed during interviews collected in the recent decades are listed with their local names used in Tusheti. The paper presents both Latin-Georgian (Tushetian) and Georgian (Tushetian)-Latin name lists of plants and mushrooms to ease the use of the material. Methods of preparation of traditional meals of the wild herbs and mushroom are described. Plants given in various literature sources under certain local names (13 in total) were not identified. Conclusions: The ethnographic sources on Tusheti published in the period from 1933-2007 and dictionaries of the Georgian language containing plant names and those focused on Georgian plants names from 1884-2005 present rich ethnobotanical and enthomycological material including linguistic data, which together with results of the recent studies gives comprehensive picture of human-plant interactions in the extreme eastern part of the Georgian Great Caucasus inhabitants. Key words: Edible plants, edible mushrooms, Tusheti, Georgia, the Caucasus.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ethnobotany Research and Applications
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32859/era.29.60.1-13
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Soil and Environmental Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Edible wild herbs and mushrooms of Tusheti (the eastern Greater Caucasus), Georgia

David Kikodze, Shalva Sikharulidze, David Chelidze, Ketevan Batsatsashvili et al.
1 citations
Ethnobotany Research and Applications
Soil and Environmental Studies
0.33
article

Edible wild herbs and mushrooms of Tusheti (the eastern Greater Caucasus), Georgia

David Kikodze, Shalva Sikharulidze, David Chelidze, Ketevan Batsatsashvili, Narel Y. Paniagua-Zambrana, Rainer Willi Bussmann, Manana Khutsishvili, Angelina Jorjadze, Inesa Maisaia
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: Wild herbs were traditionally widely used in everyday diet of the population of alpine areas of Georgia. Ethnography has a long history of research in the country, and along with the results particularly intensified ethnobotanical and ethnomycological studies of the recent decades, it is interesting to synthesize the data scattered in the Georgian ethnographic sources, an attempt of which is the present paper. Methods: The review paper is based on the Georgian ethnographic literature sources deposited at the National Parliamentary Library of Georgia (NLPG). Literature searches were performed through the NLPG catalog (https://www.nplg.¬gov.ge/geo/Catalogues) with the major keyword “Tusheti”. Dictionaries of the Georgian language and specifically those of plant names were also consulted. Results: Seventy-three species and eight genera of vascular plants (the latter without particular species as only respective generic local names were found) mentioned in the ethnographic literature sources issues before recent ethnobotanical studies (Bussmann et al. 2016, 2017) as well as 26 species of mushrooms mostly revealed during interviews collected in the recent decades are listed with their local names used in Tusheti. The paper presents both Latin-Georgian (Tushetian) and Georgian (Tushetian)-Latin name lists of plants and mushrooms to ease the use of the material. Methods of preparation of traditional meals of the wild herbs and mushroom are described. Plants given in various literature sources under certain local names (13 in total) were not identified. Conclusions: The ethnographic sources on Tusheti published in the period from 1933-2007 and dictionaries of the Georgian language containing plant names and those focused on Georgian plants names from 1884-2005 present rich ethnobotanical and enthomycological material including linguistic data, which together with results of the recent studies gives comprehensive picture of human-plant interactions in the extreme eastern part of the Georgian Great Caucasus inhabitants. Key words: Edible plants, edible mushrooms, Tusheti, Georgia, the Caucasus.

Ethnobotany Research and ApplicationsVol. 29
Ilia State University (GE), State Museum of Natural History Karlsruhe (DE), Institute of Botany (AZ)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Soil and Environmental Studies
0.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.