Monitoring active osprey nests with drones is more time efficient and less disturbing than conventional methods

Drones are used to monitor bird nesting sites at less accessible locations, such as on cliffs, human infrastructure, or within the tree canopy. While there are a growing number of studies documenting avian behavioral responses to various drones, there is a continued need to monitor taxa‐specific responses to different drone models. We explored both the time efficiency and impact of different nest survey methods (drones, nest climbing, and observations from a bucket truck) and different drone model sizes (small, medium, large) on the nest defense behavior of breeding ospreys. We conducted 166 surveys (126 drone, 25 climbing, 15 bucket truck) at 85 active nests across three nesting stages. We found variation in four of six pre‐defined behavioral categories, namely for calling, flying, at nest, and perching behaviors with survey method, sex, and nest stage. Females were more responsive to all survey methods compared to males and engaged in nest‐protection behaviors most frequently during incubation. Ospreys spent greater time at their nests during drone surveys compared to other methods. Agitated calling and flying were also less frequent during drone surveys. We recorded defensive behaviors across all survey types and there were no strikes on drones or researchers. Drone size appeared to influence behavior, with female ospreys spending, on average, 18% of survey time calling when surveyed with medium‐sized drone compared to smaller (8%) or larger (6%) models. Surveys with drones took less time to complete compared to the other methods tested. Based on our findings, drones appear to be the best choice for monitoring osprey nests as they are adaptable, time efficient, and result in less apparent disturbance to nesting ospreys than other methods tested. Our research aids in setting best practices, optimizing drone size, and developing evidence‐driven approaches for monitoring avian nests across a variety of landscapes and contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wildlife Biology
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/wlb3.01341
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Avian ecology and behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.46

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Monitoring active osprey nests with drones is more time efficient and less disturbing than conventional methods

Scott A. Rush, Jared A. Elmore, Natasha K. Murphy, Melanie R. Boudreau et al.
1 citations
Wildlife Biology
Avian ecology and behavior
0.46
article

Monitoring active osprey nests with drones is more time efficient and less disturbing than conventional methods

Scott A. Rush, Jared A. Elmore, Natasha K. Murphy, Melanie R. Boudreau, Brian S. Dorr
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Drones are used to monitor bird nesting sites at less accessible locations, such as on cliffs, human infrastructure, or within the tree canopy. While there are a growing number of studies documenting avian behavioral responses to various drones, there is a continued need to monitor taxa‐specific responses to different drone models. We explored both the time efficiency and impact of different nest survey methods (drones, nest climbing, and observations from a bucket truck) and different drone model sizes (small, medium, large) on the nest defense behavior of breeding ospreys. We conducted 166 surveys (126 drone, 25 climbing, 15 bucket truck) at 85 active nests across three nesting stages. We found variation in four of six pre‐defined behavioral categories, namely for calling, flying, at nest, and perching behaviors with survey method, sex, and nest stage. Females were more responsive to all survey methods compared to males and engaged in nest‐protection behaviors most frequently during incubation. Ospreys spent greater time at their nests during drone surveys compared to other methods. Agitated calling and flying were also less frequent during drone surveys. We recorded defensive behaviors across all survey types and there were no strikes on drones or researchers. Drone size appeared to influence behavior, with female ospreys spending, on average, 18% of survey time calling when surveyed with medium‐sized drone compared to smaller (8%) or larger (6%) models. Surveys with drones took less time to complete compared to the other methods tested. Based on our findings, drones appear to be the best choice for monitoring osprey nests as they are adaptable, time efficient, and result in less apparent disturbance to nesting ospreys than other methods tested. Our research aids in setting best practices, optimizing drone size, and developing evidence‐driven approaches for monitoring avian nests across a variety of landscapes and contexts.

Wildlife Biology
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (US), National Wildlife Research Center, Clemson University (US), Mississippi State University (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Tennessee Valley Authority, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, National Wildlife Research Center
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Avian ecology and behavior
0.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.