Beyond Mono-Method Symptom Assessment: Multimethod Extension of the Trilevel Model of Anxiety and Depression

The wide array of symptoms of and high comorbidity rates between unipolar depressive and anxiety-related disorders have raised questions about the relations among their symptoms. Factor analysis examines these relations, yet factor-analytic symptom-measurement models have relied on a single method of measurement and do not always replicate. We conceptually replicate and extend the trilevel model of anxiety and depression symptoms to encompass interviewer-rated symptoms. In the trilevel model, symptom-specific items load on three levels of factors: a narrow (or disorder-specific) factor, an intermediate-breadth factor, and a general-distress factor. The trilevel model fit well in this sample and fit better than comparison models that eliminated one of the three levels. Extension analysis successfully integrated interviewer-rating variables into the trilevel model—particularly for the broad and narrow levels. These results provide some support for the trilevel model and the use of interviewer ratings of symptoms. Research and treatment implications are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Psychological Science
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026241301048
Primary Topic
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Mono-Method Symptom Assessment: Multimethod Extension of the Trilevel Model of Anxiety and Depression

Amanda M. Kramer, Iris Ka-Yi Chat, Michelle Genevieve Craske, Alexander L. Williams et al.
Clinical Psychological Science
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
article

Beyond Mono-Method Symptom Assessment: Multimethod Extension of the Trilevel Model of Anxiety and Depression

Amanda M. Kramer, Iris Ka-Yi Chat, Michelle Genevieve Craske, Alexander L. Williams, Richard E. Zinbarg, Robin Nusslock, Nicholas J. Kelley, Madison Schmidt, Katherine S. Young, Bisley J. Kleijnen
article en

Abstract

The wide array of symptoms of and high comorbidity rates between unipolar depressive and anxiety-related disorders have raised questions about the relations among their symptoms. Factor analysis examines these relations, yet factor-analytic symptom-measurement models have relied on a single method of measurement and do not always replicate. We conceptually replicate and extend the trilevel model of anxiety and depression symptoms to encompass interviewer-rated symptoms. In the trilevel model, symptom-specific items load on three levels of factors: a narrow (or disorder-specific) factor, an intermediate-breadth factor, and a general-distress factor. The trilevel model fit well in this sample and fit better than comparison models that eliminated one of the three levels. Extension analysis successfully integrated interviewer-rating variables into the trilevel model—particularly for the broad and narrow levels. These results provide some support for the trilevel model and the use of interviewer ratings of symptoms. Research and treatment implications are discussed.

Clinical Psychological ScienceVol. 13(3)
University of California, Los Angeles (US), King's College London (GB), Family Research Institute (US), Identity (US), Neurobehavioral Systems (US), University of Southampton (GB), Temple University (US)
National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.