Impact of data structure types and spatial resolution on landslide volumetric change measurements

Terrain is a dynamic component of the landscape, subject to rapid changes, particularly in scenarios such as landslides. This study investigates how the spatial resolution and data structure of digital terrain models (DTMs) influence the estimation of landslide volume changes. We selected a landslide formed by the undercutting action of the Belá River in Slovakia as our research site. Our findings indicate that raster data structures, across various spatial resolutions, generally yield more consistent volume estimates compared to 3D mesh data structures. Nonetheless, at higher spatial resolutions (0.1 m and 0.25 m), the 3D mesh data structure demonstrates superior capability in capturing detailed terrain features, resulting in more precise volume estimations of the landslide.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geodesy and Cartography
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3846/gac.2024.20647
Primary Topic
Landslides and related hazards
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of data structure types and spatial resolution on landslide volumetric change measurements

Miloš Rusnák, Ján Šašak, Ján Kaňuk, Jozef Šupinský
Geodesy and Cartography
Landslides and related hazards
article

Impact of data structure types and spatial resolution on landslide volumetric change measurements

Miloš Rusnák, Ján Šašak, Ján Kaňuk, Jozef Šupinský
article en

Abstract

Terrain is a dynamic component of the landscape, subject to rapid changes, particularly in scenarios such as landslides. This study investigates how the spatial resolution and data structure of digital terrain models (DTMs) influence the estimation of landslide volume changes. We selected a landslide formed by the undercutting action of the Belá River in Slovakia as our research site. Our findings indicate that raster data structures, across various spatial resolutions, generally yield more consistent volume estimates compared to 3D mesh data structures. Nonetheless, at higher spatial resolutions (0.1 m and 0.25 m), the 3D mesh data structure demonstrates superior capability in capturing detailed terrain features, resulting in more precise volume estimations of the landslide.

Geodesy and CartographyVol. 50(4)
University of Pavol Jozef Šafárik (SK), Institute of Geography of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK)
Ministerstvo školstva, vedy, výskumu a športu Slovenskej republiky, Agentúra na Podporu Výskumu a Vývoja, Vedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Landslides and related hazards
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Impact of data structure types and spatial resolution on landslide volumetric change measurements — Miloš Rusnák, Ján Šašak, et al. · Geodesy and Cartography (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS