Saudi Arabia and professional football

This article critically examines common criticisms of Saudi Arabia’s sports strategy, particularly its impact on professional football. Central to Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030 is a significant investment in sports, demonstrated by hosting major international events and acquiring both domestic and foreign sports teams. Critics argue that this approach risks undermining football as a sport, and some claim that foreign players who join Saudi clubs engage in morally questionable behavior. This article challenges these critiques. While acknowledging the moral shortcomings of Saudi Arabia’s political system, it contends that the prevailing criticisms about state-owned clubs "ruining" football and the moral culpability of foreign players are flawed. A key conclusion is that the commercial interactions of foreign football players (e.g., Ronaldo) and multinational corporations (e.g., IKEA) with the Saudi regime must be assessed consistently. These interactions are either all morally permissible or all morally impermissible; there is no defensible middle ground for differing moral evaluations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sport Ethics and Philosophy
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17511321.2024.2438636
Primary Topic
Sports, Gender, and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Saudi Arabia and professional football

Jørn Sønderholm
Sport Ethics and Philosophy
Sports, Gender, and Society
article

Saudi Arabia and professional football

Jørn Sønderholm
article en

Abstract

This article critically examines common criticisms of Saudi Arabia’s sports strategy, particularly its impact on professional football. Central to Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030 is a significant investment in sports, demonstrated by hosting major international events and acquiring both domestic and foreign sports teams. Critics argue that this approach risks undermining football as a sport, and some claim that foreign players who join Saudi clubs engage in morally questionable behavior. This article challenges these critiques. While acknowledging the moral shortcomings of Saudi Arabia’s political system, it contends that the prevailing criticisms about state-owned clubs "ruining" football and the moral culpability of foreign players are flawed. A key conclusion is that the commercial interactions of foreign football players (e.g., Ronaldo) and multinational corporations (e.g., IKEA) with the Saudi regime must be assessed consistently. These interactions are either all morally permissible or all morally impermissible; there is no defensible middle ground for differing moral evaluations.

Sport Ethics and Philosophy
Aalborg University (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Sports, Gender, and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.