The Evolution of China's Domestic Climate Policy Frames (2009–2024): Problems, Solutions, and Motivations

ABSTRACT Over the past decade, The People's Republic of China has increased its influence in global climate governance. Despite the strong interest in policy frames related to climate change at the global level, few studies have explored policy frames within China. This paper therefore adopts a frame analysis to study the evolution in framing of domestic climate policies in China over the period 2009–24. Our research finds that diagnostic frames (the “problem”) identify development pressure, energy sector, and the impacts of natural disasters, pollution and ecosystem damage/change as key issues to be addressed. Prognostic frames (the “solutions”) encompass energy system decarbonization, industry reform, nature‐based solutions, market‐oriented solutions, and international cooperation. The motivational framings (the “ideational motivations”), include green development, ecological civilization, the principle of Common But Differentiated Responsibilities (CBDR), and multilateralism. The study reveals shifts in diagnostic, prognostic, and motivational frames of the national government across three periods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Policy and Governance
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.2148
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.53

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Evolution of China's Domestic Climate Policy Frames (2009–2024): Problems, Solutions, and Motivations

Mathieu Blondeel, Philipp Pattberg, Yang Beibei
4 citations
Environmental Policy and Governance
Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
4.53
article

The Evolution of China's Domestic Climate Policy Frames (2009–2024): Problems, Solutions, and Motivations

Mathieu Blondeel, Philipp Pattberg, Yang Beibei
article en
4 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Over the past decade, The People's Republic of China has increased its influence in global climate governance. Despite the strong interest in policy frames related to climate change at the global level, few studies have explored policy frames within China. This paper therefore adopts a frame analysis to study the evolution in framing of domestic climate policies in China over the period 2009–24. Our research finds that diagnostic frames (the “problem”) identify development pressure, energy sector, and the impacts of natural disasters, pollution and ecosystem damage/change as key issues to be addressed. Prognostic frames (the “solutions”) encompass energy system decarbonization, industry reform, nature‐based solutions, market‐oriented solutions, and international cooperation. The motivational framings (the “ideational motivations”), include green development, ecological civilization, the principle of Common But Differentiated Responsibilities (CBDR), and multilateralism. The study reveals shifts in diagnostic, prognostic, and motivational frames of the national government across three periods.

Environmental Policy and GovernanceVol. 35(3)
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
China Scholarship Council
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
4.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Evolution of China's Domestic Climate Policy Frames (2009–2024): Problems, Solutions, and Motivations — Mathieu Blondeel, Philipp Pattberg, et al. · Environmental Policy and Governance (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS