Fostering Media Literacy: A Systematic Evidence Review of Intervention Effectiveness for Diverse Target Groups

Investigating the effectiveness of media literacy interventions is essential to identify the most promising programs. This 2022 systematic evidence review, guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline, aimed to collect and synthesize scientific evidence on effective media literacy intervention programs across different target groups and the used frameworks. A comprehensive search across major scientific databases (Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest, Communication & Mass Media Complete, and Education Resources Information Centre) and rigorous screening and coding processes identified 119 studies on media literacy intervention effectiveness and outcomes. This review offers valuable insights into the current state of media literacy intervention research, emphasizing the importance of considering diverse target groups and exploring a wide range of outcomes to enhance our understanding of these interventions’ impact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Media and Communication
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.8901
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Child Development and Digital Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.58

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fostering Media Literacy: A Systematic Evidence Review of Intervention Effectiveness for Diverse Target Groups

Maialen Sorkunde Garmendia Larrañaga, Tania Azadi, Guna Spurava, Sylwia Opozda-Suder et al.
6 citations
Media and Communication
Child Development and Digital Technology
12.58
article

Fostering Media Literacy: A Systematic Evidence Review of Intervention Effectiveness for Diverse Target Groups

Maialen Sorkunde Garmendia Larrañaga, Tania Azadi, Guna Spurava, Sylwia Opozda-Suder, Marit Puusepp, Margus Pedaste, Natalia Edisherashvili, Erika Maksniemi, Leen d’Haenens, Lauri Hietajärvi, Rubén Araujo, Ellen Helsper, Terhi‐Anna Wilska, Niina Sormanen, Nekane Larrañaga Aizpuru, Joyce Vissenberg, Gemma Martínez Fernández, Katariina Salmela‐Aro, Dominika Sepielak, Łukasz Tomczyk, Sini Tiihonen, Verónica Donoso, Diego Martinez-Castro
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Investigating the effectiveness of media literacy interventions is essential to identify the most promising programs. This 2022 systematic evidence review, guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline, aimed to collect and synthesize scientific evidence on effective media literacy intervention programs across different target groups and the used frameworks. A comprehensive search across major scientific databases (Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest, Communication & Mass Media Complete, and Education Resources Information Centre) and rigorous screening and coding processes identified 119 studies on media literacy intervention effectiveness and outcomes. This review offers valuable insights into the current state of media literacy intervention research, emphasizing the importance of considering diverse target groups and exploring a wide range of outcomes to enhance our understanding of these interventions’ impact.

Media and CommunicationVol. 13
Jagiellonian University (PL), University of Helsinki (FI), Tampere University (FI), University of the Basque Country (ES), Institute for European Environmental Policy (BE), University of Tartu (EE), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB), University of Jyväskylä (FI)
UK Research and Innovation, European Commission, Eesti Teadusagentuur, Academy of Finland, Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Narodowe Centrum Nauki, Tartu Ülikool, Vlaamse regering, Arts and Humanities Research Council, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Child Development and Digital Technology
12.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.