Conceptual Confusion: A Barrier to Multi-Professional Involvement in Advance Care Planning in Nursing Homes – An Ethnographic Study

ObjectivesHow health and social care professionals need to work together to deliver advance care planning (ACP) in nursing homes is not fully understood, with a reliance on professionals external to the nursing home to support ACP in the United Kingdom. The objectives of this study were to (a) examine the factors that influence multi-professional involvement in the ACP process within nursing homes and (b) explore how multi-professional working impacts the ACP process in nursing homes.MethodsUsing ethnography, data was collected through observation, interviews and document review from 36 participants including residents (<i>n</i> = 6), relatives (<i>n</i> = 4), nursing home staff (<i>n</i> = 19) and visiting professionals (<i>n</i> = 7). Data analysis combined thematic analysis, mapping of ACP trajectories for participant residents, and documentary analysis of nursing home policies.ResultsThere was conceptual confusion around ACP. How ACP was understood and what was prioritised for inclusion varied between residents and professionals, and between different professionals. That ACP was frequently integrated with routine care planning was not recognised in how professionals accounted for their ACP practice. Professionals prioritised biomedical concerns, despite this not reflecting resident priorities and policy suggesting a broader definition. This created difficulties in enacting ACP, with a holistic understanding of resident wishes not always captured.ConclusionsA shared understanding of ACP was not consistently evident from those tasked with its enactment. This, combined with professional construction of ACP in biomedical terms, limits multi-professional working and can prevent a person-centred process being achieved for nursing home residents.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Palliative Care
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08258597241305846
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.09

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conceptual Confusion: A Barrier to Multi-Professional Involvement in Advance Care Planning in Nursing Homes – An Ethnographic Study

Michelle Myall, Nicola Andrews
2 citations
Journal of Palliative Care
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
1.09
article

Conceptual Confusion: A Barrier to Multi-Professional Involvement in Advance Care Planning in Nursing Homes – An Ethnographic Study

Michelle Myall, Nicola Andrews
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ObjectivesHow health and social care professionals need to work together to deliver advance care planning (ACP) in nursing homes is not fully understood, with a reliance on professionals external to the nursing home to support ACP in the United Kingdom. The objectives of this study were to (a) examine the factors that influence multi-professional involvement in the ACP process within nursing homes and (b) explore how multi-professional working impacts the ACP process in nursing homes.MethodsUsing ethnography, data was collected through observation, interviews and document review from 36 participants including residents (<i>n</i> = 6), relatives (<i>n</i> = 4), nursing home staff (<i>n</i> = 19) and visiting professionals (<i>n</i> = 7). Data analysis combined thematic analysis, mapping of ACP trajectories for participant residents, and documentary analysis of nursing home policies.ResultsThere was conceptual confusion around ACP. How ACP was understood and what was prioritised for inclusion varied between residents and professionals, and between different professionals. That ACP was frequently integrated with routine care planning was not recognised in how professionals accounted for their ACP practice. Professionals prioritised biomedical concerns, despite this not reflecting resident priorities and policy suggesting a broader definition. This created difficulties in enacting ACP, with a holistic understanding of resident wishes not always captured.ConclusionsA shared understanding of ACP was not consistently evident from those tasked with its enactment. This, combined with professional construction of ACP in biomedical terms, limits multi-professional working and can prevent a person-centred process being achieved for nursing home residents.

Journal of Palliative CareVol. 40(3)
University of Southampton (GB)
University of Southampton
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
1.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Conceptual Confusion: A Barrier to Multi-Professional Involvement in Advance Care Planning in Nursing Homes – An Ethnographic Study — Michelle Myall, Nicola Andrews · Journal of Palliative Care (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS