Training in Lumbar Pedicle Screw Instrumentation Using a 3D-Printed Model: From Validation to Transferability Onto a Cadaver Model

Lumbar pedicle screw placement in spinal surgery is complex and prone to errors, with notable risks to patients. Standard training methods, such as mentorship in operating rooms, pose safety concerns, prompting the need for alternative training tools. This study aimed to validate and use a three-dimensional (3D)-printed simulation model for lumbar pedicle screw insertion training and assess its effectiveness compared with standard methods. The study proceeded through four phases: model design and validation, construct validation, learning curve assessment, and transfer to a cadaver model. A 3D-printed lumbar spine model was created and refined based on expert feedback. Construct validation demonstrated the model's ability to differentiate between experts and novices. Training sessions with residents showed a notable improvement in performance over multiple attempts, but performance still lagged that of experts. However, skills learned on the simulation model were effectively transferred to a cadaver model, with no notable difference in performance observed. The trained group outperformed a control group trained using standard methods in the cadaver test. The study concludes that the 3D-printed simulation model is a valid training tool for lumbar pedicle screw insertion, effectively transferring skills to a cadaver setting and improving resident performance compared with standard training methods. Additional research is warranted to explore the sustainability of acquired skills and optimize training protocols.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5435/jaaos-d-24-00699
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Surgical Simulation and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Training in Lumbar Pedicle Screw Instrumentation Using a 3D-Printed Model: From Validation to Transferability Onto a Cadaver Model

Mauricio Campos Daziano, Byron Delgado, Catalina Vidal, Pablo Besa et al.
1 citations
Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
Surgical Simulation and Training
0.57
article

Training in Lumbar Pedicle Screw Instrumentation Using a 3D-Printed Model: From Validation to Transferability Onto a Cadaver Model

Mauricio Campos Daziano, Byron Delgado, Catalina Vidal, Pablo Besa, Daniel Lobos, Cristián Ruz, Javier Castro, Jorge Cuéllar
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Lumbar pedicle screw placement in spinal surgery is complex and prone to errors, with notable risks to patients. Standard training methods, such as mentorship in operating rooms, pose safety concerns, prompting the need for alternative training tools. This study aimed to validate and use a three-dimensional (3D)-printed simulation model for lumbar pedicle screw insertion training and assess its effectiveness compared with standard methods. The study proceeded through four phases: model design and validation, construct validation, learning curve assessment, and transfer to a cadaver model. A 3D-printed lumbar spine model was created and refined based on expert feedback. Construct validation demonstrated the model's ability to differentiate between experts and novices. Training sessions with residents showed a notable improvement in performance over multiple attempts, but performance still lagged that of experts. However, skills learned on the simulation model were effectively transferred to a cadaver model, with no notable difference in performance observed. The trained group outperformed a control group trained using standard methods in the cadaver test. The study concludes that the 3D-printed simulation model is a valid training tool for lumbar pedicle screw insertion, effectively transferring skills to a cadaver setting and improving resident performance compared with standard training methods. Additional research is warranted to explore the sustainability of acquired skills and optimize training protocols.

Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsVol. 33(18)
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL), Prefeitura Municipal de Campos dos Goytacazes (BR), Centre Alpien de Phytogéographie (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Surgical Simulation and Training
0.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.