Backcasting for Youths: Hypothetical and Critical Thinking in the Context of Sustainable Development Education

The growing interest in innovative pedagogies within education for sustainable development (ESD) calls for a renewed set of pedagogical practices. In responding to this challenge, this article draws on backcasting, a future studies method, to support education for ESD competencies among youths. It presents the design, trial, and results of one intervention designed to test the method in the context of secondary education, employing design thinking as an overarching methodology. Using a qualitative descriptive-interpretative approach with a thematic analysis to examine empirical data obtained from participants’ perspectives, we present their future visions, how much they were involved in the intervention, what they liked the most and the least, their perceived purpose, ease and adequacy in duration. Our findings show that youths embrace active methodologies such as backcasting. Since the method was new to them, participants experienced difficulties when logically chaining the steps necessary to achieve a desired future from the present state. Nonetheless, the skills underpinning backcasting are relevant to sustainable development, as they involve considering our actions regarding medium- and long-term impacts. In the end, we propose backcasting as a poignant method in the context of secondary education that can promote the development of hypothetical and critical thinking skills central to ESD competencies. While offering a theoretical discussion, a workshop protocol, and future directions for pedagogical practice and investigation, our results apply to researchers, sustainability education professionals, and teachers alike.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su162411088
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Environmental Education and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Backcasting for Youths: Hypothetical and Critical Thinking in the Context of Sustainable Development Education

Isabel Rosário Amorim, Ana Margarida Moura Arroz, Sónia Matos, Bruna Martins et al.
2 citations
Sustainability
Environmental Education and Sustainability
1.42
article

Backcasting for Youths: Hypothetical and Critical Thinking in the Context of Sustainable Development Education

Isabel Rosário Amorim, Ana Margarida Moura Arroz, Sónia Matos, Bruna Martins, Rosalina Maria de Almeida Gabriel
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The growing interest in innovative pedagogies within education for sustainable development (ESD) calls for a renewed set of pedagogical practices. In responding to this challenge, this article draws on backcasting, a future studies method, to support education for ESD competencies among youths. It presents the design, trial, and results of one intervention designed to test the method in the context of secondary education, employing design thinking as an overarching methodology. Using a qualitative descriptive-interpretative approach with a thematic analysis to examine empirical data obtained from participants’ perspectives, we present their future visions, how much they were involved in the intervention, what they liked the most and the least, their perceived purpose, ease and adequacy in duration. Our findings show that youths embrace active methodologies such as backcasting. Since the method was new to them, participants experienced difficulties when logically chaining the steps necessary to achieve a desired future from the present state. Nonetheless, the skills underpinning backcasting are relevant to sustainable development, as they involve considering our actions regarding medium- and long-term impacts. In the end, we propose backcasting as a poignant method in the context of secondary education that can promote the development of hypothetical and critical thinking skills central to ESD competencies. While offering a theoretical discussion, a workshop protocol, and future directions for pedagogical practice and investigation, our results apply to researchers, sustainability education professionals, and teachers alike.

SustainabilityVol. 16(24)
Universidade dos Açores (PT), Free University of Bozen-Bolzano (IT), Madeira Tecnopolo (PT), Instituto de Tecnologias Interativas
Universidade dos Açores, Libera Università di Bolzano, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Environmental Education and Sustainability
1.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.