Research trends and prospects in global riverine carbon fluxes: A bibliometric analysis

• A systematic analysis of riverine carbon transport was performed. • 1,592 documents in total from 1997 to 2023 were analyzed. • In the future, the index quantification, scaling algorithms, and modeling framework of RCFs should be further investigated. Rivers are critical conduits of transporting and transforming carbon from land to coastal margins. Accurate estimates of the riverine carbon fluxes (RCFs) are crucial in assessing global carbon budget. Recently, a growing number of research has been conducted in this field. However, there still lacks a systematic analysis concerning the emerging, development, current status, and future trends of RCFs in existing studies. To identify the major characteristics and evolution of the research on RCFs, this study adopts a bibliometric method to analyze the publications retrieved from Web of Science during 1997–2023. The information related to journals, collaboration, keywords, and research evolution is statistically analyzed and scientifically visualized through R studio, VOSviewer, and CiteSpace. Findings indicate that a total of 1,592 documents from 368 different journals related to RCFs have been published by 7,035 researchers affiliated with 2,019 institutes from 95 countries. Research on RCFs has sharply increased since 2009, with an average annual publication number of 115. Around 45% of the total publications are attributed to the research categories of Environmental Science, and the most productive journal, country, institute, and author are Science of the Total Environment , the USA, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and Worral from Durham University, respectively. The analysis of keywords demonstrates that current study on RCFs mainly focus on monitoring the fluxes of multiple forms of carbon in the fluvial systems, modeling the fluxes of riverine carbon at larger scales, elaborating the complex biogeochemical processes of riverine carbon transport. Future research should further investigate the index quantification, scaling algorithms, and modeling framework of RCFs. This study contributes to holistically understanding the evolution and prevailing trends in the field of RCFs, and better constraining the carbon budgets at the regional or global scales.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Indicators
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112985
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research trends and prospects in global riverine carbon fluxes: A bibliometric analysis

Mohd Remy Rozainy Mohd Arif Zainol, Wei Fang, Pingping Luo, Xianbao Zha
2 citations
Ecological Indicators
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
0.57
article

Research trends and prospects in global riverine carbon fluxes: A bibliometric analysis

Mohd Remy Rozainy Mohd Arif Zainol, Wei Fang, Pingping Luo, Xianbao Zha
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• A systematic analysis of riverine carbon transport was performed. • 1,592 documents in total from 1997 to 2023 were analyzed. • In the future, the index quantification, scaling algorithms, and modeling framework of RCFs should be further investigated. Rivers are critical conduits of transporting and transforming carbon from land to coastal margins. Accurate estimates of the riverine carbon fluxes (RCFs) are crucial in assessing global carbon budget. Recently, a growing number of research has been conducted in this field. However, there still lacks a systematic analysis concerning the emerging, development, current status, and future trends of RCFs in existing studies. To identify the major characteristics and evolution of the research on RCFs, this study adopts a bibliometric method to analyze the publications retrieved from Web of Science during 1997–2023. The information related to journals, collaboration, keywords, and research evolution is statistically analyzed and scientifically visualized through R studio, VOSviewer, and CiteSpace. Findings indicate that a total of 1,592 documents from 368 different journals related to RCFs have been published by 7,035 researchers affiliated with 2,019 institutes from 95 countries. Research on RCFs has sharply increased since 2009, with an average annual publication number of 115. Around 45% of the total publications are attributed to the research categories of Environmental Science, and the most productive journal, country, institute, and author are Science of the Total Environment , the USA, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and Worral from Durham University, respectively. The analysis of keywords demonstrates that current study on RCFs mainly focus on monitoring the fluxes of multiple forms of carbon in the fluvial systems, modeling the fluxes of riverine carbon at larger scales, elaborating the complex biogeochemical processes of riverine carbon transport. Future research should further investigate the index quantification, scaling algorithms, and modeling framework of RCFs. This study contributes to holistically understanding the evolution and prevailing trends in the field of RCFs, and better constraining the carbon budgets at the regional or global scales.

Ecological IndicatorsVol. 170
Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY), Kyoto University (JP), Chang'an University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
0.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.