Limited immediate effects of wildfire on Alaska moose harvest

Qualitative studies have suggested that forest changes following a wildfire can challenge a hunter’s ability to harvest big game, such as moose ( Alces alces). Quantitative effects have not been estimated. Given the increasing prevalence of wildfires, the strong linkages between wildfire and moose habitat, and the importance of moose to the people of the boreal region of North America, our goal was to assess if and how moose harvest patterns changed immediately following a wildfire. To address that goal, we used 36 years (1984–2019) of spatially explicit wildfire and moose harvest data in Alaska to compare moose harvest variables the year before and year after a wildfire occurred. With a few exceptions, the number of hunters, kills, and success rates were similar ( p > 0.05, effect size < 0.3) between pre- and post-wildfire years. We estimated a weak to moderate effect on change in moose hunter numbers, kills, and success rate in only a small percentage (1.5%) of wildfires that burned a very large proportion (>38%) of a moose harvest reporting unit. Our findings suggest that wildfire has not caused a clear and functional quantitative effect on hunters’ ability to harvest moose in Alaska.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Forest Research
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2024-0112
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.28

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Limited immediate effects of wildfire on Alaska moose harvest

Todd J. Brinkman, Thomas F. Paragi, Jennifer E. Schmidt
1 citations
Canadian Journal of Forest Research
Fire effects on ecosystems
0.28
article

Limited immediate effects of wildfire on Alaska moose harvest

Todd J. Brinkman, Thomas F. Paragi, Jennifer E. Schmidt
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Qualitative studies have suggested that forest changes following a wildfire can challenge a hunter’s ability to harvest big game, such as moose ( Alces alces). Quantitative effects have not been estimated. Given the increasing prevalence of wildfires, the strong linkages between wildfire and moose habitat, and the importance of moose to the people of the boreal region of North America, our goal was to assess if and how moose harvest patterns changed immediately following a wildfire. To address that goal, we used 36 years (1984–2019) of spatially explicit wildfire and moose harvest data in Alaska to compare moose harvest variables the year before and year after a wildfire occurred. With a few exceptions, the number of hunters, kills, and success rates were similar ( p > 0.05, effect size < 0.3) between pre- and post-wildfire years. We estimated a weak to moderate effect on change in moose hunter numbers, kills, and success rate in only a small percentage (1.5%) of wildfires that burned a very large proportion (>38%) of a moose harvest reporting unit. Our findings suggest that wildfire has not caused a clear and functional quantitative effect on hunters’ ability to harvest moose in Alaska.

Canadian Journal of Forest ResearchVol. 55
Alaska Department of Fish and Game (US), University of Alaska Fairbanks (US), University of Alaska Anchorage (US)
National Science Foundation, Massachusetts Department of Fish and Game, Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Office of Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Fire effects on ecosystems
0.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.