Deriving fertiliser recommendations for cocoa: An offtake model approach

Cocoa production in West Africa has increased over the years, yet yields are stagnant due to factors such as limited fertiliser use, poor maintenance, and inadequate pest control. The existing knowledge on cocoa mineral nutrition is limited, with outdated and inconsistent fertiliser recommendations across countries and regions. This study aimed to develop and describe a cocoa N, P, K offtake model based on nutrient export (pods and beans) and immobilisation in the tree. The model was used to calculate fertiliser rates for a series of 195 on-farm trials in Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana, Nigeria, and Cameroon. We compare the cocoa yields in response to fertiliser rates derived using the offtake model with the response to national recommendations in each country. On each farm, four treatment plots were delineated. The treatments were: T1 = current farmer practice, T2 = weeding + pruning + insecticide application + fungicide application (no fertiliser application), T3 = weeding + pruning + insecticide application + fungicide application + current national fertiliser recommendation, and T4 = weeding + pruning + insecticide application + fungicide application + offtake model-based fertiliser recommendation. Yields were recorded from September 2021 to August 2022 and an economic assessment was conducted using two different scenario prices for the years 2020/2021 and 2022/2023. Our results showed a positive effect of fertiliser on cocoa yield wherein T3 (1109 kg ha −1 ) and T4 (1227 kg ha −1 ) had significantly higher yields than T1 (912 kg ha −1 ) and T2 (917 kg ha −1 ). A positive overall yield effect of T4 over T3 was also observed; however, the difference was significant only in Côte d’Ivoire. The economic assessment showed that the treatment based on the offtake model (T4) gave a higher gross return than the national recommendations (T3) in all countries. However, the benefits decreased from 20/21–22/23 due to an increase in fertiliser prices. Our findings show that using an offtake model approach could provide a more accurate approximation of cocoa’s nutrient needs. Nonetheless, while the cocoa farm-gate price remains low, the investment capacity of the farmers to purchase fertiliser will remain limited. • Cocoa yields can be improved by increasing fertiliser application. • An offtake cocoa model based on nutrients (N, P, K) offtake and immobilisation in the tree might better approximate cocoa’s nutrient needs. • Despite the positive impact of fertilisers on cocoa yield, challenges such as low cocoa farm-gate prices limit farmers' investment capacity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Agronomy
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2024.127463
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.59

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deriving fertiliser recommendations for cocoa: An offtake model approach

Joost van Heerwaarden, Stefan Hauser, Léonard Rusinamhodzi, K.E. Giller et al.
3 citations
European Journal of Agronomy
Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy
2.59
article

Deriving fertiliser recommendations for cocoa: An offtake model approach

Joost van Heerwaarden, Stefan Hauser, Léonard Rusinamhodzi, K.E. Giller, Lotte Suzanne Woittiez, Ekatherina Vasquez-Zambrano
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Cocoa production in West Africa has increased over the years, yet yields are stagnant due to factors such as limited fertiliser use, poor maintenance, and inadequate pest control. The existing knowledge on cocoa mineral nutrition is limited, with outdated and inconsistent fertiliser recommendations across countries and regions. This study aimed to develop and describe a cocoa N, P, K offtake model based on nutrient export (pods and beans) and immobilisation in the tree. The model was used to calculate fertiliser rates for a series of 195 on-farm trials in Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana, Nigeria, and Cameroon. We compare the cocoa yields in response to fertiliser rates derived using the offtake model with the response to national recommendations in each country. On each farm, four treatment plots were delineated. The treatments were: T1 = current farmer practice, T2 = weeding + pruning + insecticide application + fungicide application (no fertiliser application), T3 = weeding + pruning + insecticide application + fungicide application + current national fertiliser recommendation, and T4 = weeding + pruning + insecticide application + fungicide application + offtake model-based fertiliser recommendation. Yields were recorded from September 2021 to August 2022 and an economic assessment was conducted using two different scenario prices for the years 2020/2021 and 2022/2023. Our results showed a positive effect of fertiliser on cocoa yield wherein T3 (1109 kg ha −1 ) and T4 (1227 kg ha −1 ) had significantly higher yields than T1 (912 kg ha −1 ) and T2 (917 kg ha −1 ). A positive overall yield effect of T4 over T3 was also observed; however, the difference was significant only in Côte d’Ivoire. The economic assessment showed that the treatment based on the offtake model (T4) gave a higher gross return than the national recommendations (T3) in all countries. However, the benefits decreased from 20/21–22/23 due to an increase in fertiliser prices. Our findings show that using an offtake model approach could provide a more accurate approximation of cocoa’s nutrient needs. Nonetheless, while the cocoa farm-gate price remains low, the investment capacity of the farmers to purchase fertiliser will remain limited. • Cocoa yields can be improved by increasing fertiliser application. • An offtake cocoa model based on nutrients (N, P, K) offtake and immobilisation in the tree might better approximate cocoa’s nutrient needs. • Despite the positive impact of fertilisers on cocoa yield, challenges such as low cocoa farm-gate prices limit farmers' investment capacity.

European Journal of AgronomyVol. 164
Graduate School Experimental Plant Sciences (NL), International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (NG), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Direktoratet for Utviklingssamarbeid
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy
2.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.