Writing A Doctoral Exegesis for A European Style Doctorate, Higher Doctorate, Doctorate by Publication, and Doctorates by Previously Published or Creative Works in Business, Technology, and Healthcare

Abstract Despite the increasing availability of doctoral programs in Business, Healthcare, Technology, and Creative Works offering completion through the publication process and requiring an exegesis, a significant gap persists in the comprehensive guidance provided to candidates. Guidance documents, handbooks, and recruiters frequently need to offer detailed instructions on constructing a comprehensive and acceptable exegesis and the required works necessary to form a compelling portfolio. This gap presents a notable challenge for candidates pursuing a doctoral or PhD by published works, an alternative route to obtaining a doctoral degree. In this model, candidates compile a collection of their previously published works, typically articles in refereed journals, and submit them as the core component of their doctoral thesis/dissertation. This approach enables experienced researchers or creative artists with a successful track record of publications to consolidate their work into a cohesive body of research for examination. Alongside these publications, candidates are required to write a commentary or synthesis, known as the exegesis, which contextualizes the publications, elucidates the overarching theme or contribution of the work, and reflects on the significance of the research. However, the lack of clear and comprehensive guidance on constructing this critical component leaves many candidates needing guidance on effectively presenting their work, potentially undermining the quality and coherence of their submissions, and hindering their success in completing their doctoral programs. This inquiry explores an under-discussed area and a significant gap in academic literature using document analysis and subject matter expert interviews. This study aims to provide a robust framework to assist candidates in successfully navigating this alternative doctoral pathway.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Academiei Forţelor Terestre
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/raft-2024-0052
Primary Topic
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Writing A Doctoral Exegesis for A European Style Doctorate, Higher Doctorate, Doctorate by Publication, and Doctorates by Previously Published or Creative Works in Business, Technology, and Healthcare

Darrell Norman Burrell
Revista Academiei Forţelor Terestre
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
article

Writing A Doctoral Exegesis for A European Style Doctorate, Higher Doctorate, Doctorate by Publication, and Doctorates by Previously Published or Creative Works in Business, Technology, and Healthcare

Darrell Norman Burrell
article en

Abstract

Abstract Despite the increasing availability of doctoral programs in Business, Healthcare, Technology, and Creative Works offering completion through the publication process and requiring an exegesis, a significant gap persists in the comprehensive guidance provided to candidates. Guidance documents, handbooks, and recruiters frequently need to offer detailed instructions on constructing a comprehensive and acceptable exegesis and the required works necessary to form a compelling portfolio. This gap presents a notable challenge for candidates pursuing a doctoral or PhD by published works, an alternative route to obtaining a doctoral degree. In this model, candidates compile a collection of their previously published works, typically articles in refereed journals, and submit them as the core component of their doctoral thesis/dissertation. This approach enables experienced researchers or creative artists with a successful track record of publications to consolidate their work into a cohesive body of research for examination. Alongside these publications, candidates are required to write a commentary or synthesis, known as the exegesis, which contextualizes the publications, elucidates the overarching theme or contribution of the work, and reflects on the significance of the research. However, the lack of clear and comprehensive guidance on constructing this critical component leaves many candidates needing guidance on effectively presenting their work, potentially undermining the quality and coherence of their submissions, and hindering their success in completing their doctoral programs. This inquiry explores an under-discussed area and a significant gap in academic literature using document analysis and subject matter expert interviews. This study aims to provide a robust framework to assist candidates in successfully navigating this alternative doctoral pathway.

Revista Academiei Forţelor TerestreVol. 29(4)
Capitol Technology University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Writing A Doctoral Exegesis for A European Style Doctorate, Higher Doctorate, Doctorate by Publication, and Doctorates by Previously Published or Creative Works in Business, Technology, and Healthcare — Darrell Norman Burrell · Revista Academiei Forţelor Terestre (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS