Promoting the recovery of soil health in As and Sb-polluted soils: new evidence from the biochar-compost option

The role of compost and biochar in the recovery of As and Sb-polluted soils is poorly investigated, as well as the influence of their application rates on soil health and quality. In this study, we therefore investigated the effectiveness over time (2, 4, and 6 months, M) of a municipal solid waste compost (MSWC) and a biochar (BC), applied at 10 and 30% rates, and of selected mixtures (MIX; applied at 10 and 30% total rates, 1:1 ratio of MSWC and BC), on labile As and Sb in a polluted soil from an abandoned Sb mine (Djebel Hamimat, Algeria). At the same timepoints, the amendment impact on soil chemistry was also monitored, while the activity and diversity of the resident microbial communities were investigated at 6 M. After 6 months, MSWC, BC, and MIX applied at the higher rate significantly increased soil pH (from 7.5 up to 8.2), while MSWC and MIX increased soil EC to worrying values. The soil dissolved organic carbon content was also greatly increased by MSWC and MIX at the higher rates (up to 50-fold), while BC showed a negligible impact. All the amendments reduced the concentration of labile Sb in soil, with BC 10% being the most effective treatment (i.e., reducing labile Sb from ~ 60 to 20 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> soil). On the contrary, only BC and MIX applied at 10% significantly reduced labile As (e.g., from ~ 12 to 4 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> soil in the case of BC). MSWC and MIX at both rates increased up to 2000-fold soil dehydrogenase activity, while BC showed a null impact. The Biolog community level physiological profile and sequencing of the partial 16S rRNA gene showed a reduction of catabolic activity and α-diversity and a change of the community composition of bacterial populations in treated soils. Overall, MIX treatment, especially at 10%, was the most promising option for the chemical and biological recovery of As and Sb-polluted soils.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-35650-3
Primary Topic
Arsenic contamination and mitigation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Promoting the recovery of soil health in As and Sb-polluted soils: new evidence from the biochar-compost option

Sotirios Vasileiadis, Oualida Rached, Stefania Diquattro, Alima Bentellis et al.
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
Arsenic contamination and mitigation
article

Promoting the recovery of soil health in As and Sb-polluted soils: new evidence from the biochar-compost option

Sotirios Vasileiadis, Oualida Rached, Stefania Diquattro, Alima Bentellis, Paola Castaldi, Giovanni Garau, Amina Boukhatem
article en

Abstract

The role of compost and biochar in the recovery of As and Sb-polluted soils is poorly investigated, as well as the influence of their application rates on soil health and quality. In this study, we therefore investigated the effectiveness over time (2, 4, and 6 months, M) of a municipal solid waste compost (MSWC) and a biochar (BC), applied at 10 and 30% rates, and of selected mixtures (MIX; applied at 10 and 30% total rates, 1:1 ratio of MSWC and BC), on labile As and Sb in a polluted soil from an abandoned Sb mine (Djebel Hamimat, Algeria). At the same timepoints, the amendment impact on soil chemistry was also monitored, while the activity and diversity of the resident microbial communities were investigated at 6 M. After 6 months, MSWC, BC, and MIX applied at the higher rate significantly increased soil pH (from 7.5 up to 8.2), while MSWC and MIX increased soil EC to worrying values. The soil dissolved organic carbon content was also greatly increased by MSWC and MIX at the higher rates (up to 50-fold), while BC showed a negligible impact. All the amendments reduced the concentration of labile Sb in soil, with BC 10% being the most effective treatment (i.e., reducing labile Sb from ~ 60 to 20 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> soil). On the contrary, only BC and MIX applied at 10% significantly reduced labile As (e.g., from ~ 12 to 4 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> soil in the case of BC). MSWC and MIX at both rates increased up to 2000-fold soil dehydrogenase activity, while BC showed a null impact. The Biolog community level physiological profile and sequencing of the partial 16S rRNA gene showed a reduction of catabolic activity and α-diversity and a change of the community composition of bacterial populations in treated soils. Overall, MIX treatment, especially at 10%, was the most promising option for the chemical and biological recovery of As and Sb-polluted soils.

Environmental Science and Pollution ResearchVol. 32(2)
University of Thessaly (GR), University of Sassari (IT), École Normale Supérieure de Constantine (DZ)
Università degli Studi di Sassari
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Arsenic contamination and mitigation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.