Methods for Quantitative Evaluation of Individual Differences in Tactile Perception: Euclidean Distance, Cosine Similarity, and Their Hybrid Indices

As tactile evaluation is an important assessment indicator for consumer product developments, the importance of objective tactile evaluation is increasing. However, individual differences among subjects in tactile research has not been sufficiently investigated. This paper focuses on individual differences in tactile perception and proposes a method for quantifying the similarity with a developed index. We compared three representative indicators, Euclidean distance, cosine similarity, and their hybrid index, for measuring the similarity in sensory evaluation data for tactile sensation of aluminum plates. Comparison of the conventional 2 indices revealed that opposite tactile sensations were observed, leading to the misjudgment of similarity between subjects. While, the proposed hybrid index provided better clustering of the subjects, resulting in extracting more accurate tactile factors than those obtained with the conventional indicators.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Affective Engineering
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5057/ijae.ijae-d-24-00028
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Color perception and design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Methods for Quantitative Evaluation of Individual Differences in Tactile Perception: Euclidean Distance, Cosine Similarity, and Their Hybrid Indices

Kaito Kikuhara, Kenjiro Takemura
2 citations
International Journal of Affective Engineering
Color perception and design
1.29
article

Methods for Quantitative Evaluation of Individual Differences in Tactile Perception: Euclidean Distance, Cosine Similarity, and Their Hybrid Indices

Kaito Kikuhara, Kenjiro Takemura
article en
2 citations

Abstract

As tactile evaluation is an important assessment indicator for consumer product developments, the importance of objective tactile evaluation is increasing. However, individual differences among subjects in tactile research has not been sufficiently investigated. This paper focuses on individual differences in tactile perception and proposes a method for quantifying the similarity with a developed index. We compared three representative indicators, Euclidean distance, cosine similarity, and their hybrid index, for measuring the similarity in sensory evaluation data for tactile sensation of aluminum plates. Comparison of the conventional 2 indices revealed that opposite tactile sensations were observed, leading to the misjudgment of similarity between subjects. While, the proposed hybrid index provided better clustering of the subjects, resulting in extracting more accurate tactile factors than those obtained with the conventional indicators.

International Journal of Affective EngineeringVol. 24(1)
Keio University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Color perception and design
1.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Methods for Quantitative Evaluation of Individual Differences in Tactile Perception: Euclidean Distance, Cosine Similarity, and Their Hybrid Indices — Kaito Kikuhara, Kenjiro Takemura · International Journal of Affective Engineering (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS