Early Modern Women and Latin Literary Culture: Assessing the Evidence of Manuscript Verse

The study of early modern Latinity has increased rapidly in methodological and analytical sophistication in recent years, including welcome attention to Latin writing by women. Nevertheless, the assumption has tended to be that Latin texts of the period were written almost exclusively by and for men and boys. The evidence for women as readers and writers is often partial and complex to interpret, and early modern Latin remains an understudied field with relatively few scholarly guides even to basic questions about style, form, and genre. This essay sets out some guiding principles for this kind of work by considering how best to assess manuscript material as additional evidence for the circulation, readership, and reception of an already known woman Latin poet (Katherine Killigrew, née Cooke), and discussing evidence for female Latinity more widely, among women who are not known as Latinists. Texts under consideration include apparently uncirculated Latin verse by otherwise unknown women and Latin verse addressed to women, a category which has not, to my knowledge, been discussed before as a unified phenomenon. [V.M.]

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
English Literary Renaissance
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/733216
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Renaissance Literature and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
21.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Early Modern Women and Latin Literary Culture: Assessing the Evidence of Manuscript Verse

Victoria Moul
1 citations
English Literary Renaissance
Renaissance Literature and Culture
21.21
article

Early Modern Women and Latin Literary Culture: Assessing the Evidence of Manuscript Verse

Victoria Moul
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The study of early modern Latinity has increased rapidly in methodological and analytical sophistication in recent years, including welcome attention to Latin writing by women. Nevertheless, the assumption has tended to be that Latin texts of the period were written almost exclusively by and for men and boys. The evidence for women as readers and writers is often partial and complex to interpret, and early modern Latin remains an understudied field with relatively few scholarly guides even to basic questions about style, form, and genre. This essay sets out some guiding principles for this kind of work by considering how best to assess manuscript material as additional evidence for the circulation, readership, and reception of an already known woman Latin poet (Katherine Killigrew, née Cooke), and discussing evidence for female Latinity more widely, among women who are not known as Latinists. Texts under consideration include apparently uncirculated Latin verse by otherwise unknown women and Latin verse addressed to women, a category which has not, to my knowledge, been discussed before as a unified phenomenon. [V.M.]

English Literary RenaissanceVol. 55(1)
Sorbonne Université (FR), Sorbonne University Abu Dhabi (AE), University College London (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Renaissance Literature and Culture
21.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.