Apollonius Dyscolus’ Treatise <i>On the Pronoun</i> or <i>On Pronouns</i>? Troubles with the Text’s Transmission

Three treatises have survived from the work of the grammarian Apollonius Dyscolus (second century CE) on the study of the parts of speech: one on pronouns, one on adverbs, and one on conjunctions. The aim of this article is to take stock of one particular aspect of the manuscript tradition in this corpus that is as intriguing as it is marginal: in the sole surviving manuscript, two of these three treatises are entitled in the plural—Περὶ ἐπιρρημάτων (On Adverbs) and Περὶ συνδέσμων (On Conjunctions)—while the third is in the singular: Περὶ ἀντωνυμίας (On the Pronoun). The first aim of our investigation is to explain this strange disparity and outline the reasons why it has become so widespread in Apollonian studies. On this basis, in view to re-editing the treatise On the Pronoun, it will be necessary to decide whether to maintain the singular form or to use a plural form, as in the case of the other two.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Classical Philology
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/733210
Primary Topic
Classical Antiquity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Apollonius Dyscolus’ Treatise On the Pronoun or On Pronouns? Troubles with the Text’s Transmission

Lionel Dumarty
Classical Philology
Classical Antiquity Studies
article

Apollonius Dyscolus’ Treatise On the Pronoun or On Pronouns? Troubles with the Text’s Transmission

Lionel Dumarty
article en

Abstract

Three treatises have survived from the work of the grammarian Apollonius Dyscolus (second century CE) on the study of the parts of speech: one on pronouns, one on adverbs, and one on conjunctions. The aim of this article is to take stock of one particular aspect of the manuscript tradition in this corpus that is as intriguing as it is marginal: in the sole surviving manuscript, two of these three treatises are entitled in the plural—Περὶ ἐπιρρημάτων (On Adverbs) and Περὶ συνδέσμων (On Conjunctions)—while the third is in the singular: Περὶ ἀντωνυμίας (On the Pronoun). The first aim of our investigation is to explain this strange disparity and outline the reasons why it has become so widespread in Apollonian studies. On this basis, in view to re-editing the treatise On the Pronoun, it will be necessary to decide whether to maintain the singular form or to use a plural form, as in the case of the other two.

Classical PhilologyVol. 120(1)
Université Sorbonne Nouvelle (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR), Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Classical Antiquity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.