Starting with Practical Reason in Aristotle’s <i>Nicomachean Ethics</i> VI 1: About the Object of the Calculative Part of the Soul

This article is about the object of the calculative part of the rational soul, as it is characterized in Nicomachean Ethics VI 1. Lines 1139a6–8 are usually read as claiming that the calculative part deals with the contingent. I argue for another reading of these crucial lines, according to which the calculative part deals more specifically with actions and decisions, which are things whose principles can be otherwise. The difficulty of these lines is partly due to an ambiguity in the notion of “principle,” which can refer both to a moving principle and to a conceptual principle. My reading underlines the role of the agent as a (moving) principle of actions, and hence takes a distinctively practical perspective, based on which I also offer a way of accounting for the coexistence of both necessary and “true for the most part” principles in Aristotelian ethics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Classical Philology
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/733139
Primary Topic
Classical Philosophy and Thought
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Starting with Practical Reason in Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics VI 1: About the Object of the Calculative Part of the Soul

Gabriela Rossi
Classical Philology
Classical Philosophy and Thought
article

Starting with Practical Reason in Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics VI 1: About the Object of the Calculative Part of the Soul

Gabriela Rossi
article en

Abstract

This article is about the object of the calculative part of the rational soul, as it is characterized in Nicomachean Ethics VI 1. Lines 1139a6–8 are usually read as claiming that the calculative part deals with the contingent. I argue for another reading of these crucial lines, according to which the calculative part deals more specifically with actions and decisions, which are things whose principles can be otherwise. The difficulty of these lines is partly due to an ambiguity in the notion of “principle,” which can refer both to a moving principle and to a conceptual principle. My reading underlines the role of the agent as a (moving) principle of actions, and hence takes a distinctively practical perspective, based on which I also offer a way of accounting for the coexistence of both necessary and “true for the most part” principles in Aristotelian ethics.

Classical PhilologyVol. 120(1)
Universidad de Los Andes, Chile (CL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Classical Philosophy and Thought
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.