Institutions make a difference: assessing the predictors of climate policy stringency using machine learning

Abstract Despite the urgent need for ambitious national climate policies to reduce carbon emissions, their implementation lacks stringency. This lack of policy stringency is driven by a complex combination of a country’s numerous politico-economic, institutional and socio-economic characteristics. While extant studies aim at estimating causal effects between a selection of such characteristics and policy stringency, we examine the importance of a comprehensive set of predictors that underlie such empirical models. For this purpose, we employ machine-learning methods on a data set covering 22 potential predictors of policy stringency for 95 countries. Conditional random forests suggest that the most important predictors of policy stringency are of institutional nature: freedom (of press, media, associations, and elections), governmental effectiveness, and control of corruption. Further, accumulated local effects plots suggest that the relationship between some predictors, e.g. freedom or education, and policy stringency is highly non-linear.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Research Letters
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ada0cb
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Institutions make a difference: assessing the predictors of climate policy stringency using machine learning

Angelika von Dulong, Achim Hagen
4 citations
Environmental Research Letters
Climate Change Policy and Economics
4.52
article

Institutions make a difference: assessing the predictors of climate policy stringency using machine learning

Angelika von Dulong, Achim Hagen
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Despite the urgent need for ambitious national climate policies to reduce carbon emissions, their implementation lacks stringency. This lack of policy stringency is driven by a complex combination of a country’s numerous politico-economic, institutional and socio-economic characteristics. While extant studies aim at estimating causal effects between a selection of such characteristics and policy stringency, we examine the importance of a comprehensive set of predictors that underlie such empirical models. For this purpose, we employ machine-learning methods on a data set covering 22 potential predictors of policy stringency for 95 countries. Conditional random forests suggest that the most important predictors of policy stringency are of institutional nature: freedom (of press, media, associations, and elections), governmental effectiveness, and control of corruption. Further, accumulated local effects plots suggest that the relationship between some predictors, e.g. freedom or education, and policy stringency is highly non-linear.

Environmental Research LettersVol. 20(1)
Berlin School of Economics and Law (DE), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
4.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.