The ‘Brussels 4’: essential requirements for implantable brain–computer interface user autonomy

<i>Objective</i>. Implantable brain-computer interfaces (iBCIs) hold great promise for individuals with severe paralysis and are advancing toward commercialization. The features required for successful clinical translation and patient adoption of iBCIs may be under recognized within traditional academic iBCI research and deserve further consideration.<i>Approach</i>. Here we consider potentially critical factors to achieve iBCI user autonomy, reflecting the authors' perspectives on discussions during various sessions and workshops across the 10th International BCI Society Meeting, Brussels, 2023.<i>Main results</i>. Four key considerations were identified: (1) immediate use, (2) easy to use, (3) continuous use, and (4) stable system use.<i>Significance</i>. Addressing these considerations may enable successful clinical translation of iBCIs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neural Engineering
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ada0e6
Primary Topic
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The ‘Brussels 4’: essential requirements for implantable brain–computer interface user autonomy

David Putrino, Abbey Sawyer, Darrel R. Deo, Nick F. Ramsey et al.
Journal of Neural Engineering
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
article

The ‘Brussels 4’: essential requirements for implantable brain–computer interface user autonomy

David Putrino, Abbey Sawyer, Darrel R. Deo, Nick F. Ramsey, Adam Fry, Thomas J. Oxley, Stephanie Cernera
article en

Abstract

<i>Objective</i>. Implantable brain-computer interfaces (iBCIs) hold great promise for individuals with severe paralysis and are advancing toward commercialization. The features required for successful clinical translation and patient adoption of iBCIs may be under recognized within traditional academic iBCI research and deserve further consideration.<i>Approach</i>. Here we consider potentially critical factors to achieve iBCI user autonomy, reflecting the authors' perspectives on discussions during various sessions and workshops across the 10th International BCI Society Meeting, Brussels, 2023.<i>Main results</i>. Four key considerations were identified: (1) immediate use, (2) easy to use, (3) continuous use, and (4) stable system use.<i>Significance</i>. Addressing these considerations may enable successful clinical translation of iBCIs.

Journal of Neural EngineeringVol. 22(1)
The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Utrecht University (NL), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), Mount Sinai Hospital (US), Synchronoss (United States) (US), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The ‘Brussels 4’: essential requirements for implantable brain–computer interface user autonomy — David Putrino, Abbey Sawyer, et al. · Journal of Neural Engineering (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS