Tactile sensitivity to softness in virtual reality can increase when visual expectation and tactile feedback contradict each other

<i>Objective</i>. The perception of softness plays a key role in interactions with various objects, both in the real world and in virtual/augmented reality (VR/AR) systems. The latter can be enriched with haptic feedback on virtual objects' softness to improve immersivity and realism. In such systems, visual expectation can influence tactile sensitivity to softness, as multisensory integration attempts to create a coherent perceptual experience. Nevertheless, expectation is sometimes reported to attenuate, and other times to enhance, perception. Elucidating how the perception of softness is affected by visual expectation in VR/AR is relevant not only to the neuropsychology and neuroscience of perception, but also to practical applications, such as VR/AR-based training or rehabilitation.<i>Approach.</i>Here, by using novel wearable tactile displays of softness previously described by us, we investigated how the sensitivity to softness in a visuo-tactile VR platform can be influenced by expectation. Twelve subjects were engaged in comparing the softness of pairs of virtual objects, familiar or not, with tactile feedback of softness and visual expectation either conflicting or not. The objects' Young's moduli were initially randomly selected from a large set, spanning two orders of magnitude (0.5, 2, 20, 50 and 100 MPa), and then their difference was iteratively reduced, to reach the just noticeable difference in softness.<i>Main results.</i>For the intermediate modulus, a conflict between tactile feedback and visual expectation caused a statistically significant increase in sensitivity.<i>Significance.</i>This finding supports the theory that there can be conditions in which contradictory stimuli strengthen attention (to resolve conflicting sensory information), which in turn can reverse the sensory silencing effect that expectation may otherwise have on perception.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neural Engineering
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ada0e8
Primary Topic
Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tactile sensitivity to softness in virtual reality can increase when visual expectation and tactile feedback contradict each other

Federico Carpi, Gabriele Frediani
Journal of Neural Engineering
Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
article

Tactile sensitivity to softness in virtual reality can increase when visual expectation and tactile feedback contradict each other

Federico Carpi, Gabriele Frediani
article en

Abstract

<i>Objective</i>. The perception of softness plays a key role in interactions with various objects, both in the real world and in virtual/augmented reality (VR/AR) systems. The latter can be enriched with haptic feedback on virtual objects' softness to improve immersivity and realism. In such systems, visual expectation can influence tactile sensitivity to softness, as multisensory integration attempts to create a coherent perceptual experience. Nevertheless, expectation is sometimes reported to attenuate, and other times to enhance, perception. Elucidating how the perception of softness is affected by visual expectation in VR/AR is relevant not only to the neuropsychology and neuroscience of perception, but also to practical applications, such as VR/AR-based training or rehabilitation.<i>Approach.</i>Here, by using novel wearable tactile displays of softness previously described by us, we investigated how the sensitivity to softness in a visuo-tactile VR platform can be influenced by expectation. Twelve subjects were engaged in comparing the softness of pairs of virtual objects, familiar or not, with tactile feedback of softness and visual expectation either conflicting or not. The objects' Young's moduli were initially randomly selected from a large set, spanning two orders of magnitude (0.5, 2, 20, 50 and 100 MPa), and then their difference was iteratively reduced, to reach the just noticeable difference in softness.<i>Main results.</i>For the intermediate modulus, a conflict between tactile feedback and visual expectation caused a statistically significant increase in sensitivity.<i>Significance.</i>This finding supports the theory that there can be conditions in which contradictory stimuli strengthen attention (to resolve conflicting sensory information), which in turn can reverse the sensory silencing effect that expectation may otherwise have on perception.

Journal of Neural EngineeringVol. 21(6)
Don Carlo Gnocchi Foundation (IT), University of Florence (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.