A new airtight sampling method for sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) in groundwater
In the past 20 years, sulfur hexafluoride (SF<sub>6</sub>) has been considered a highly reliable tracer for assessing modern water (< 65 yrs old) in groundwater. However, modern-air contamination may introduce complications in interpreting data obtained using current sampling methods. A new airtight methodology isolates the sample from modern ambient air; thus, returning more reproducible and reliable results when compared to two traditional (air-sensitive and non-airtight) methods. The new airtight method returned results within 0.03-0.05 fmol/L SF<sub>6</sub> of expected SF<sub>6</sub> concentration for pre-modern waters (0.02-0.09±0.01 fmol/L). In contrast, the air-sensitive and non-airtight traditional methods returned results within 0.00-0.90 fmol/L and 0.02-1.21 fmol/L of the expected value, respectively. It is suspected that transformers in proximity to wells leak SF<sub>6</sub> which subsequently partitions into the samples obtained using traditional air-sensitive and non-airtight methods, thus creating erratic SF<sub>6</sub> results.•Comparative analyses of a new airtight method with traditional methods were performed and returned lower SF<sub>6</sub> concentrations with the new 2022 airtight method.•The new airtight method shows reproducible low-level detection of SF<sub>6</sub> concentrations and may reduce sampling error in production wells in urban areas that are co-located with transformers which are SF<sub>6</sub>-emitting sources.
Authors
- Scott Schoefernacker
- Deborah L. Leslie (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4686-5846)
- Raka Sunderland
- Dan Larsen
Institutions
- University of Memphis (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- MethodsX
- Published
- 2024-12-18
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2024.103120
- Primary Topic
- Groundwater flow and contamination studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- University of Memphis
- U.S. Geological Survey