Understanding automation transparency and its adaptive design implications in safety–critical systems

• Transparency guides design by enabling context-driven information exchange for shared awareness, performance and trust. • Transparency requires automation feedback on system processes, data, rationale and future actions to the operator. • Automation transparency positively impacts system performance but has a complex relationship with factors like workload, SA, trust, and acceptance. • Adaptive automation transparency departs from a fixed design approach into a dynamic and customizable approach. Automation is designed to assist operators and enhance system performance and safety. When unexpected events occur, and the operator is not able to understand the behaviour of the automated system a sudden rise in cognitive workload occurs, compromising decision-making, performance, and safety. Automation transparency as a human-centric design principle is a potential intervention in the design of human-automation systems that can remedy these countereffects. Human-centricity of advanced automated systems is one of the focal areas of Industry 5.0 and automation transparency is a potential design principle that will become even more important in this new era. Thus, this concept must be well-understood, and its design implications must be highlighted. This understanding of the current state of automation transparency is important for entering a new era with more complex systems. The literature includes varied definition and approaches to transparency with mixed results on its influence on automation system design factors, making it hard to understand design implications. This paper addresses this need. This work stemmed from a broader systematic literature review and specifically zoomed in on the included literature that explicitly mentioned the terms ‘automation transparency’ and ‘transparency’ in their abstracts and filtered for these articles in Rayyan software. These articles were screened for full text relevance, being empirical papers, using qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods. Fourteen resulting articles were analysed, as representative exemplars of empirical and recent work in this field, to see how automation transparency is being understood, what is its significance in relation to other automation system design factors, and what are the design implications. The findings showed a progressive trend from the emphasis on static, high transparency towards an emphasis on human centred adaptive transparency and explainability which is aligned with the focus of Industry 5.0. Adaptive transparency design implications derived from the analysis are presented along with limitations of the current research and the future research implications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Safety Science
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106730
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.22

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding automation transparency and its adaptive design implications in safety–critical systems

Stig Ole Johnsen, Lene Elisabeth Bertheussen, Ole Andreas Alsos, Stine Thordarson Moltubakk et al.
5 citations
Safety Science
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
3.22
article

Understanding automation transparency and its adaptive design implications in safety–critical systems

Stig Ole Johnsen, Lene Elisabeth Bertheussen, Ole Andreas Alsos, Stine Thordarson Moltubakk, Mina Saghafian, Dorthea Mathilde Kristin Vatn, Franz Petermann
article en
5 citations

Abstract

• Transparency guides design by enabling context-driven information exchange for shared awareness, performance and trust. • Transparency requires automation feedback on system processes, data, rationale and future actions to the operator. • Automation transparency positively impacts system performance but has a complex relationship with factors like workload, SA, trust, and acceptance. • Adaptive automation transparency departs from a fixed design approach into a dynamic and customizable approach. Automation is designed to assist operators and enhance system performance and safety. When unexpected events occur, and the operator is not able to understand the behaviour of the automated system a sudden rise in cognitive workload occurs, compromising decision-making, performance, and safety. Automation transparency as a human-centric design principle is a potential intervention in the design of human-automation systems that can remedy these countereffects. Human-centricity of advanced automated systems is one of the focal areas of Industry 5.0 and automation transparency is a potential design principle that will become even more important in this new era. Thus, this concept must be well-understood, and its design implications must be highlighted. This understanding of the current state of automation transparency is important for entering a new era with more complex systems. The literature includes varied definition and approaches to transparency with mixed results on its influence on automation system design factors, making it hard to understand design implications. This paper addresses this need. This work stemmed from a broader systematic literature review and specifically zoomed in on the included literature that explicitly mentioned the terms ‘automation transparency’ and ‘transparency’ in their abstracts and filtered for these articles in Rayyan software. These articles were screened for full text relevance, being empirical papers, using qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods. Fourteen resulting articles were analysed, as representative exemplars of empirical and recent work in this field, to see how automation transparency is being understood, what is its significance in relation to other automation system design factors, and what are the design implications. The findings showed a progressive trend from the emphasis on static, high transparency towards an emphasis on human centred adaptive transparency and explainability which is aligned with the focus of Industry 5.0. Adaptive transparency design implications derived from the analysis are presented along with limitations of the current research and the future research implications.

Safety ScienceVol. 184
SINTEF (NO), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), Institute of Transport Economics (NO), SINTEF Digital
Norges Forskningsråd
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
3.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.