Effects of reasoned treatment decision-making on parent-related outcomes: Results from a video-vignette experiment in neonatal care
We argue that reasoned decision-making should be considered a good clinical practice, core to patient-centered communication. Our findings provide a starting point for (1) determining good argumentative practices and (2) designing evidence-based clinical argumentation trainings.
Authors
- Nanon Labrie (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5483-0152)
- Sylvia A Obermann-Borst (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8886-6892)
- Marleen Kunneman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5334-1085)
- Anne Van Kempen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3959-7353)
- Liesbeth M. van Vliet (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7965-5998)
- Nicole R. van Veenendaal (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0222-8132)
Institutions
- Leiden University (NL)
- Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
- Emma Kinderziekenhuis (NL)
- OLVG (NL)
- Duchenne Parent Project (NL)
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Patient Education and Counseling
- Published
- 2024-12-18
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2024.108625
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Child and Animal Learning Development
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.37
Funders
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek