Preclinical medical education: pathology through the eyes of experiential and integrated learning

The present study aimed to assess the efficacy of applying active learning and integrated methodologies in the undergraduate Pathology medical education curriculum. Another goal was to acquire student feedback and explore the students’ motivation and perceptions on Pathology education. Our study involved two parts: (1) a quasi-experimental part, involving medical students enrolled in our Pathology course. An optional educational intervention was offered until the end of the semester, in parallel with the already established curriculum. The intervention involved integrated case-based seminars and group-based presentations of Pathology cases. We used a multivariate regression model in order to better assess the educational effectiveness of our method; and (2) a questionnaire-based cross-sectional survey was held at the end of the semester. The set of questions for the intervention group mainly involved feedback about our educational method, while the questions for the control group involved questions about Pathology education in general. 348 Students completed the study. The performance of the intervention group was significantly improved at post-test. From the questionnaire, we found that intervention participants gave positive feedback, while their main reason for participation was because they already valued the Pathology professor’s teaching style. As for non-participants, even though most of them were interested in an integrated/experiential approach, more than half chose not to participate because of lack of time in general or in order to study for the final exams. Active learning and integrated methodologies seem to be of value in undergraduate Pathology teaching. However, regardless of the instructional approach, shifting the emphasis from purely summative achievement to formative, learning-centered development is essential. A successful educator must therefore not only employ innovative methods but also encourage intrinsic motivation and a deeper, more reflective approach to learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Education
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00379-1
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preclinical medical education: pathology through the eyes of experiential and integrated learning

Charalampos C. Mylonas, Ariadni Menti, Evangelia Manou, Andreas C. Lazaris et al.
2 citations
Discover Education
Innovations in Medical Education
1.09
article

Preclinical medical education: pathology through the eyes of experiential and integrated learning

Charalampos C. Mylonas, Ariadni Menti, Evangelia Manou, Andreas C. Lazaris, Georgia Eleni Thomopoulou, Nikolaos Kavantzas, Evgenia Charikleia Lazari
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The present study aimed to assess the efficacy of applying active learning and integrated methodologies in the undergraduate Pathology medical education curriculum. Another goal was to acquire student feedback and explore the students’ motivation and perceptions on Pathology education. Our study involved two parts: (1) a quasi-experimental part, involving medical students enrolled in our Pathology course. An optional educational intervention was offered until the end of the semester, in parallel with the already established curriculum. The intervention involved integrated case-based seminars and group-based presentations of Pathology cases. We used a multivariate regression model in order to better assess the educational effectiveness of our method; and (2) a questionnaire-based cross-sectional survey was held at the end of the semester. The set of questions for the intervention group mainly involved feedback about our educational method, while the questions for the control group involved questions about Pathology education in general. 348 Students completed the study. The performance of the intervention group was significantly improved at post-test. From the questionnaire, we found that intervention participants gave positive feedback, while their main reason for participation was because they already valued the Pathology professor’s teaching style. As for non-participants, even though most of them were interested in an integrated/experiential approach, more than half chose not to participate because of lack of time in general or in order to study for the final exams. Active learning and integrated methodologies seem to be of value in undergraduate Pathology teaching. However, regardless of the instructional approach, shifting the emphasis from purely summative achievement to formative, learning-centered development is essential. A successful educator must therefore not only employ innovative methods but also encourage intrinsic motivation and a deeper, more reflective approach to learning.

Discover EducationVol. 3(1)
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Innovations in Medical Education
1.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.