How Chatbots Respond to NCLEX-RN Practice Questions

ChatGPT often "hallucinates" or misleads, underscoring the need for formal validation at the professional level for reliable use in nursing education. We evaluated two free chatbots (Google Gemini and GPT-3.5) and a commercial version (GPT-4) on 250 standardized questions from a simulated nursing licensure exam, which closely matches the content and complexity of the actual exam. Gemini achieved 73.2 percent (183/250), GPT-3.5 achieved 72 percent (180/250), and GPT-4 reached a notably higher performance with 92.4 percent (231/250). GPT-4 exhibited its highest error rate (13.3%) in the psychosocial integrity category.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nursing Education Perspectives
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.nep.0000000000001364
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.12
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Chatbots Respond to NCLEX-RN Practice Questions

Eloy Opisso, M. Fernández, Alejandro García‐Rudolph, David Sánchez-Pinsach et al.
1 citations
Nursing Education Perspectives
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.12
article

How Chatbots Respond to NCLEX-RN Practice Questions

Eloy Opisso, M. Fernández, Alejandro García‐Rudolph, David Sánchez-Pinsach, Elena Hernández-Pena, Sandra Cunyat
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ChatGPT often "hallucinates" or misleads, underscoring the need for formal validation at the professional level for reliable use in nursing education. We evaluated two free chatbots (Google Gemini and GPT-3.5) and a commercial version (GPT-4) on 250 standardized questions from a simulated nursing licensure exam, which closely matches the content and complexity of the actual exam. Gemini achieved 73.2 percent (183/250), GPT-3.5 achieved 72 percent (180/250), and GPT-4 reached a notably higher performance with 92.4 percent (231/250). GPT-4 exhibited its highest error rate (13.3%) in the psychosocial integrity category.

Nursing Education PerspectivesVol. 46(2)
Institut Guttmann (ES), Metric Systems Corporation (United States) (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.