Artificial Intelligence for Tooth Detection in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients

<b>Introduction:</b> Cleft lip and palate patients often present with unique anatomical challenges, making dental anomaly detection and numbering particularly complex. The accurate identification of teeth in these patients is crucial for effective treatment planning and long-term management. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a promising tool for enhancing diagnostic precision, yet its application in this specific patient population remains underexplored. <b>Objectives:</b> This study aimed to evaluate the performance of an AI-based software in detecting and numbering teeth in cleft lip and palate patients. The research focused on assessing the system's sensitivity, precision, and specificity, while identifying potential limitations in specific anatomical regions and demographic groups. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 100 panoramic radiographs (52 males, 48 females) from patients aged 6 to 15 years were analyzed using AI software. Sensitivity, precision, and specificity were calculated, with ground truth annotations provided by four experienced orthodontists. The AI system's performance was compared across age and gender groups, with particular attention to areas prone to misidentification. <b>Results:</b> The AI system demonstrated high overall sensitivity (0.98 ± 0.03) and precision (0.96 ± 0.04). No statistically significant differences were found between age groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05), but challenges were observed in the maxillary left region, which exhibited higher false positive and false negative rates. These findings were consistent with the prevalence of unilateral left clefts in the study population. <b>Conclusions:</b> The AI system was effective in detecting and numbering teeth in cleft lip and palate patients, but further refinement is required for improved accuracy in the cleft region, particularly on the left side. Addressing these limitations could enhance the clinical utility of AI in managing complex craniofacial cases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14242849
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence for Tooth Detection in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients

Can Arslan, Ezgi Sunal Aktürk, Derya Germeç Çakan, Kaan Kahya et al.
7 citations
Diagnostics
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
3.85
article

Artificial Intelligence for Tooth Detection in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients

Can Arslan, Ezgi Sunal Aktürk, Derya Germeç Çakan, Kaan Kahya, Nesli Özüm Yücel
article en
7 citations

Abstract

<b>Introduction:</b> Cleft lip and palate patients often present with unique anatomical challenges, making dental anomaly detection and numbering particularly complex. The accurate identification of teeth in these patients is crucial for effective treatment planning and long-term management. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a promising tool for enhancing diagnostic precision, yet its application in this specific patient population remains underexplored. <b>Objectives:</b> This study aimed to evaluate the performance of an AI-based software in detecting and numbering teeth in cleft lip and palate patients. The research focused on assessing the system's sensitivity, precision, and specificity, while identifying potential limitations in specific anatomical regions and demographic groups. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 100 panoramic radiographs (52 males, 48 females) from patients aged 6 to 15 years were analyzed using AI software. Sensitivity, precision, and specificity were calculated, with ground truth annotations provided by four experienced orthodontists. The AI system's performance was compared across age and gender groups, with particular attention to areas prone to misidentification. <b>Results:</b> The AI system demonstrated high overall sensitivity (0.98 ± 0.03) and precision (0.96 ± 0.04). No statistically significant differences were found between age groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05), but challenges were observed in the maxillary left region, which exhibited higher false positive and false negative rates. These findings were consistent with the prevalence of unilateral left clefts in the study population. <b>Conclusions:</b> The AI system was effective in detecting and numbering teeth in cleft lip and palate patients, but further refinement is required for improved accuracy in the cleft region, particularly on the left side. Addressing these limitations could enhance the clinical utility of AI in managing complex craniofacial cases.

DiagnosticsVol. 14(24)
Yeditepe University (TR), Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR), Istanbul University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
3.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.