Running performance in Australopithecus afarensis

The evolution of bipedal gait is a key adaptive feature in hominids,<sup>1</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>2</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>3</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>4</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>5</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>6</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>7</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>8</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>9</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>10</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>11</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>12</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>13</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>14</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>15</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>16</sup> but the running abilities of early hominins have not been extensively studied.<sup>2</sup> Here, we present physics simulations of Australopithecus afarensis that demonstrate this genus was mechanically capable of bipedal running but with absolute and relative (size-normalized) maximum speeds considerably inferior to modern humans. Simulations predicted running energetics for Australopithecus that are generally consistent with values for mammals and birds of similar body size, therefore suggesting relatively low cost of transport across a limited speed range. Through model parameterization, we demonstrate the key role of ankle extensor muscle architecture (e.g., the Achilles tendon) in the evolution of hominin running energetics and indeed in an increase in speed range, which may have been intrinsically coupled with enhanced endurance running capacity. We show that skeletal strength was unlikely to have been a limiting factor in the evolution of enhanced running ability, which instead resulted from changes to muscle anatomy and particularly overall body proportions. These findings support the hypothesis that key features in the human body plan evolved specifically for improved running performance<sup>2</sup>,<sup>3</sup> and not merely as a byproduct of selection for enhanced walking capabilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Biology
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2024.11.025
Citations
17
Primary Topic
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
63.23

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Running performance in Australopithecus afarensis

William I. Sellers, Pasha A. van Bijlert, James P. Charles, Samuel J. Coatham et al.
17 citations
Current Biology
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
63.23
article

Running performance in Australopithecus afarensis

William I. Sellers, Pasha A. van Bijlert, James P. Charles, Samuel J. Coatham, Shana E. McCormack, Karl T. Bates, Charlotte Brassey, Thomas O'mahoney, Evie Donald
article en
17 citations

Abstract

The evolution of bipedal gait is a key adaptive feature in hominids,<sup>1</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>2</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>3</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>4</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>5</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>6</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>7</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>8</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>9</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>10</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>11</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>12</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>13</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>14</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>15</sup><sup>,</sup><sup>16</sup> but the running abilities of early hominins have not been extensively studied.<sup>2</sup> Here, we present physics simulations of Australopithecus afarensis that demonstrate this genus was mechanically capable of bipedal running but with absolute and relative (size-normalized) maximum speeds considerably inferior to modern humans. Simulations predicted running energetics for Australopithecus that are generally consistent with values for mammals and birds of similar body size, therefore suggesting relatively low cost of transport across a limited speed range. Through model parameterization, we demonstrate the key role of ankle extensor muscle architecture (e.g., the Achilles tendon) in the evolution of hominin running energetics and indeed in an increase in speed range, which may have been intrinsically coupled with enhanced endurance running capacity. We show that skeletal strength was unlikely to have been a limiting factor in the evolution of enhanced running ability, which instead resulted from changes to muscle anatomy and particularly overall body proportions. These findings support the hypothesis that key features in the human body plan evolved specifically for improved running performance<sup>2</sup>,<sup>3</sup> and not merely as a byproduct of selection for enhanced walking capabilities.

Current BiologyVol. 35(1)
Manchester Metropolitan University (GB), Naturalis Biodiversity Center (NL), University of Liverpool (GB), University of Manchester (GB), Anglia Ruskin University (GB), University of Sunderland (GB)
Palaeontological Association, Leverhulme Trust, Sight Research UK, Natural Environment Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
63.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.