“We all grow up with our mob because it takes all of us”: First Nations collective kinship in Australia

• Being raised by and within ones' First Nations community, among one's mob and fully immersed in culture, is a fundamental part of the First Nations being. • Shifting towards systemic transformation through increased First Nations self-determination and control of OOHC systems and placements. • The Minintitja Care Model is an example of the power and promise that First Nations self-determination holds to deliever improved outcomes and accountability. • A Funddamental redesigning of OOHC services are delivered to First Nations children in Australia by drawing on First NAtions knowledges, traditions and values. Being raised by and within ones’ First Nations community, among one’s mob and fully immersed in culture, is a fundamental part of First Nations being. This is an aspect of First Nations being that has been disrupted through colonial practices targeting First Nations families, such as the Stolen Generations where 10–30% of all First Nations children were forcibly removed from their families in the twentieth century. It also continues in the contemporary through statutory child removals in Australia, where the continued overrepresentation of First Nations children in Australian child protection and OOHC systems has resulted in community concerns of another Stolen Generations. Shifting towards systemic transformation through increased First Nations self-determination and control of OOHC systems, this article describes an innovative model of kinship care, the ‘Minintitja Care Model’, that one First Nations community designed and delivered in rural New South Wales, Australia. The Minintitja Care Model is an example of the power and promise that First Nations self-determination holds to deliver improved outcomes for First Nations children in OOHC in Australia. We argue that it evidences the importance of fundamentally redesigning how OOHC services are delivered to First Nations children in Australia by drawing on First Nations knowledge, tradition and value. Yet redesigning a system that was not built for the benefit of First Nations children and families requires more than reform: it requires the bravery to envision new possibilities by drawing on ancient wisdom. This, we contend, is aligned with the tenets of abolition, as applied from a First Nations standpoint.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Children and Youth Services Review
Published
2024-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.108059
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.17
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“We all grow up with our mob because it takes all of us”: First Nations collective kinship in Australia

Jacynta Krakouer, AM Kelly, James Beaufils, Dana Hogg
6 citations
Children and Youth Services Review
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
3.17
article

“We all grow up with our mob because it takes all of us”: First Nations collective kinship in Australia

Jacynta Krakouer, AM Kelly, James Beaufils, Dana Hogg
article en
6 citations

Abstract

• Being raised by and within ones' First Nations community, among one's mob and fully immersed in culture, is a fundamental part of the First Nations being. • Shifting towards systemic transformation through increased First Nations self-determination and control of OOHC systems and placements. • The Minintitja Care Model is an example of the power and promise that First Nations self-determination holds to deliever improved outcomes and accountability. • A Funddamental redesigning of OOHC services are delivered to First Nations children in Australia by drawing on First NAtions knowledges, traditions and values. Being raised by and within ones’ First Nations community, among one’s mob and fully immersed in culture, is a fundamental part of First Nations being. This is an aspect of First Nations being that has been disrupted through colonial practices targeting First Nations families, such as the Stolen Generations where 10–30% of all First Nations children were forcibly removed from their families in the twentieth century. It also continues in the contemporary through statutory child removals in Australia, where the continued overrepresentation of First Nations children in Australian child protection and OOHC systems has resulted in community concerns of another Stolen Generations. Shifting towards systemic transformation through increased First Nations self-determination and control of OOHC systems, this article describes an innovative model of kinship care, the ‘Minintitja Care Model’, that one First Nations community designed and delivered in rural New South Wales, Australia. The Minintitja Care Model is an example of the power and promise that First Nations self-determination holds to deliver improved outcomes for First Nations children in OOHC in Australia. We argue that it evidences the importance of fundamentally redesigning how OOHC services are delivered to First Nations children in Australia by drawing on First Nations knowledge, tradition and value. Yet redesigning a system that was not built for the benefit of First Nations children and families requires more than reform: it requires the bravery to envision new possibilities by drawing on ancient wisdom. This, we contend, is aligned with the tenets of abolition, as applied from a First Nations standpoint.

Children and Youth Services ReviewVol. 169
University of Technology Sydney (AU), National Archives and Records Administration (US), Central Land Council (AU), Australia Zoo (AU), Department for Child Protection and Family Support (AU), Aboriginal Health Council of South Australia (AU)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
3.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.