Efficiency comparison of maximum likelihood estimation in log–logistic distribution using median ranked set sampling

This paper investigates maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) of the scale parameter, denoted as α , and shape parameter, denoted as β , in the context of the log–logistic distribution, employing median ranked set sampling (MRSS). The study examines the scenarios where one of the parameters is known and cases where both parameters are unknown. The derived estimators based on MRSS are compared with conventional estimators in simple random sampling (SRS) and ranked set sampling (RSS), evaluating biases, mean squared errors, and relative efficiencies across various set and cycle sizes. Closed-form expressions of the Fisher information concerning the unknown parameters are obtained using the Mellin transform. A Monte Carlo simulation study is conducted using R software with 10,000 repetitions. Results indicate that when β is known, the MLE of α based on MRSS demonstrates the highest efficiency, whereas when α is known, the MLE of β based on RSS exhibits superior efficiency. In cases where both parameters are unknown, the MLEs of α and β based on MRSS and RSS outperform those obtained through SRS. • Efficient MLE using MRSS in log–logistic distribution. • MRSS superiority over RSS and SRS in parameter estimation. • Closed-form Fisher information via Mellin transform. • Superiority of MRSS in efficiency for known parameters. • Practical insights for sampling techniques in parameter estimation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Kuwait Journal of Science
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjs.2024.100350
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficiency comparison of maximum likelihood estimation in log–logistic distribution using median ranked set sampling

Monjed H. Samuh, Alaa Jamal
2 citations
Kuwait Journal of Science
Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
1.42
article

Efficiency comparison of maximum likelihood estimation in log–logistic distribution using median ranked set sampling

Monjed H. Samuh, Alaa Jamal
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This paper investigates maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) of the scale parameter, denoted as α , and shape parameter, denoted as β , in the context of the log–logistic distribution, employing median ranked set sampling (MRSS). The study examines the scenarios where one of the parameters is known and cases where both parameters are unknown. The derived estimators based on MRSS are compared with conventional estimators in simple random sampling (SRS) and ranked set sampling (RSS), evaluating biases, mean squared errors, and relative efficiencies across various set and cycle sizes. Closed-form expressions of the Fisher information concerning the unknown parameters are obtained using the Mellin transform. A Monte Carlo simulation study is conducted using R software with 10,000 repetitions. Results indicate that when β is known, the MLE of α based on MRSS demonstrates the highest efficiency, whereas when α is known, the MLE of β based on RSS exhibits superior efficiency. In cases where both parameters are unknown, the MLEs of α and β based on MRSS and RSS outperform those obtained through SRS. • Efficient MLE using MRSS in log–logistic distribution. • MRSS superiority over RSS and SRS in parameter estimation. • Closed-form Fisher information via Mellin transform. • Superiority of MRSS in efficiency for known parameters. • Practical insights for sampling techniques in parameter estimation.

Kuwait Journal of ScienceVol. 52(1)
Palestine Polytechnic University (PS)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
1.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.