Comparisons between forward- and backward-inclined film injection over an effusion wall with internal jet-array impingement: Cooling effectiveness, heat transfer, and analytical model

• The effects of hole geometry and injection direction are investigated. • Heat transfer and cooling characteristics for impingement-effusion systems are evaluated. • A comprehensive comparison of backward and forward injection is presented. • An analytical prediction model for conjugate heat transfer analysis is developed. In a backward injection configuration, the film jets are injected into mainstream flows in a reverse direction, which could effectively weaken the development of kidney vortexes and improve the film coverage and uniformity. This experimental study provides comprehensive and integrated comparisons of forward and backward injection of an effusion wall with internal jet array impingement, concerning heat transfer coefficient, and adiabatic and overall cooling effectiveness. The shapes of the film holes involve cylindrical and fan-shaped holes. Pressure Sensitive Paint technique is applied to measure detailed adiabatic film cooling effectiveness distribution. Heat transfer coefficient is obtained by a steady heat flux method with a film foil heater. Furthermore, a conjugate heat transfer method evaluates combined cooling effect, and resulting overall cooling effectiveness is measured by the infrared technology. Results demonstrate that within the blowing ratios of 0.3–2.0, adiabatic effectiveness peaks at blowing ratios of 0.6 and 1.5 for the cylindrical and fan-shaped film holes with forward injection, and then decreases with further increasing the coolant flow rate. Compared with forward injection, backward injection enhances lateral diffusion of the coolant and reduces sensitivity to blowing ratio, maintaining high external cooling performance under a variety of blowing ratios. However, due to a more vigorous interaction, backward injection produces higher external heat transfer, suppressing superior external cooling at high blowing ratios, thereby resulting in a poorer overall cooling performance. Finally, an analytical model for conjugate heat transfer of impingement-effusion cooling structures is developed and verified.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Thermal Engineering
Published
2024-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2024.125280
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Heat Transfer Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.06

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparisons between forward- and backward-inclined film injection over an effusion wall with internal jet-array impingement: Cooling effectiveness, heat transfer, and analytical model

Zhao Liu, Zhenping Feng, Xing Yang, Hang Wu
5 citations
Applied Thermal Engineering
Heat Transfer Mechanisms
1.06
article

Comparisons between forward- and backward-inclined film injection over an effusion wall with internal jet-array impingement: Cooling effectiveness, heat transfer, and analytical model

Zhao Liu, Zhenping Feng, Xing Yang, Hang Wu
article en
5 citations

Abstract

• The effects of hole geometry and injection direction are investigated. • Heat transfer and cooling characteristics for impingement-effusion systems are evaluated. • A comprehensive comparison of backward and forward injection is presented. • An analytical prediction model for conjugate heat transfer analysis is developed. In a backward injection configuration, the film jets are injected into mainstream flows in a reverse direction, which could effectively weaken the development of kidney vortexes and improve the film coverage and uniformity. This experimental study provides comprehensive and integrated comparisons of forward and backward injection of an effusion wall with internal jet array impingement, concerning heat transfer coefficient, and adiabatic and overall cooling effectiveness. The shapes of the film holes involve cylindrical and fan-shaped holes. Pressure Sensitive Paint technique is applied to measure detailed adiabatic film cooling effectiveness distribution. Heat transfer coefficient is obtained by a steady heat flux method with a film foil heater. Furthermore, a conjugate heat transfer method evaluates combined cooling effect, and resulting overall cooling effectiveness is measured by the infrared technology. Results demonstrate that within the blowing ratios of 0.3–2.0, adiabatic effectiveness peaks at blowing ratios of 0.6 and 1.5 for the cylindrical and fan-shaped film holes with forward injection, and then decreases with further increasing the coolant flow rate. Compared with forward injection, backward injection enhances lateral diffusion of the coolant and reduces sensitivity to blowing ratio, maintaining high external cooling performance under a variety of blowing ratios. However, due to a more vigorous interaction, backward injection produces higher external heat transfer, suppressing superior external cooling at high blowing ratios, thereby resulting in a poorer overall cooling performance. Finally, an analytical model for conjugate heat transfer of impingement-effusion cooling structures is developed and verified.

Applied Thermal EngineeringVol. 262
National Major Science and Technology Projects of China
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Heat Transfer Mechanisms
1.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.