Evaluating data requirements for high-quality haplotype-resolved genomes for creating robust pangenome references

Our study provides insights into optimal data types and volumes for robust de novo genome assembly in population-level pangenome projects. Reassessing the recommended data types and volumes in this study and aligning them with practical economic limitations are vital to the pangenome research community, contributing to their efforts and pushing genomic studies with broader impacts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Genome biology
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-024-03452-y
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.10

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating data requirements for high-quality haplotype-resolved genomes for creating robust pangenome references

Mile Šikić, Josipa Lipovac, Filip Tomas, Prasad Sarashetti et al.
9 citations
Genome biology
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
2.10
article

Evaluating data requirements for high-quality haplotype-resolved genomes for creating robust pangenome references

Mile Šikić, Josipa Lipovac, Filip Tomas, Prasad Sarashetti, Jianjun Liu
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Our study provides insights into optimal data types and volumes for robust de novo genome assembly in population-level pangenome projects. Reassessing the recommended data types and volumes in this study and aligning them with practical economic limitations are vital to the pangenome research community, contributing to their efforts and pushing genomic studies with broader impacts.

Genome biologyVol. 25(1)
Agency for Science, Technology and Research (SG), National University of Singapore (SG), University of Zagreb (HR), Genome Institute of Singapore (SG)
Oxford Nanopore Technologies, European Commission, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Hrvatska Zaklada za Znanost, Genome Institute of Singapore, European Regional Development Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
2.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.