Main Barriers in Reducing Microbial Load in Raw Vegetables Served on Brazilian School Menus

This study assessed raw vegetable sanitizing in Brazilian schools and identified barriers to standards. This experimental and quantitative study was conducted in 12 school food services in the Federal District (Brazil) public primary education institutions. Microbiological analyses were conducted with vegetable samples (before and after sanitizing) and water used in the sanitization process, collected before the process. The Petrifilm®E. coli/Coliform Count Plates and COLIlert methods were used to evaluate vegetables and water samples, and a checklist of good practices was applied in each school food service to identify barriers to proper sanitization. Thirty-five samples of raw vegetables were offered to students, 32 samples of water, and 17 hygiene processes were evaluated. The results indicate that 76.5% (n = 13) of hygiene processes were considered unsatisfactory, with an average increase of 5.8 log CFU g−1 (DV = 7.4) in the initial microbial load in 47.1% (n = 8) of the evaluated processes; moreover, 33.3% (n = 6) of the samples exceeded the tolerable limit, with an average value above 1.5 × 103 CFU/g. Attention to food handler training and necessary organizational changes is essential to ensure safe food and promote healthy student eating habits, highlighting the importance of strengthening basic hygiene practices and following the parameters for sanitizing vegetables.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hygiene
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/hygiene4040040
Primary Topic
Food Safety and Hygiene
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Main Barriers in Reducing Microbial Load in Raw Vegetables Served on Brazilian School Menus

Ester Rose, Raquel Braz Assunção Botelho, Verônica Cortez Ginani, Emanuele Batistela dos Santos et al.
1 links
Hygiene
Food Safety and Hygiene
article

Main Barriers in Reducing Microbial Load in Raw Vegetables Served on Brazilian School Menus

Ester Rose, Raquel Braz Assunção Botelho, Verônica Cortez Ginani, Emanuele Batistela dos Santos, Sueny Andrade Batista, Márcia Regina Gabardo da Câmara, Pedro Tourinho Dantas
article en

Abstract

This study assessed raw vegetable sanitizing in Brazilian schools and identified barriers to standards. This experimental and quantitative study was conducted in 12 school food services in the Federal District (Brazil) public primary education institutions. Microbiological analyses were conducted with vegetable samples (before and after sanitizing) and water used in the sanitization process, collected before the process. The Petrifilm®E. coli/Coliform Count Plates and COLIlert methods were used to evaluate vegetables and water samples, and a checklist of good practices was applied in each school food service to identify barriers to proper sanitization. Thirty-five samples of raw vegetables were offered to students, 32 samples of water, and 17 hygiene processes were evaluated. The results indicate that 76.5% (n = 13) of hygiene processes were considered unsatisfactory, with an average increase of 5.8 log CFU g−1 (DV = 7.4) in the initial microbial load in 47.1% (n = 8) of the evaluated processes; moreover, 33.3% (n = 6) of the samples exceeded the tolerable limit, with an average value above 1.5 × 103 CFU/g. Attention to food handler training and necessary organizational changes is essential to ensure safe food and promote healthy student eating habits, highlighting the importance of strengthening basic hygiene practices and following the parameters for sanitizing vegetables.

HygieneVol. 4(4)
Universidade de Brasília (BR), Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso (BR)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa do Distrito Federal
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Food Safety and Hygiene
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.