International Perspectives on Assistive Technologies for Autism and Intellectual Disabilities: Findings from a Delphi Study

Advancements in Assistive Technologies (ATs) have significantly improved the quality of life and autonomy for people with intellectual disabilities and autistic individuals, enhancing education, social interaction, employment, and mental health. Nevertheless, several barriers still emerge in the daily implementation of such technologies, highlighting the need to explore them in depth. Using a two-round Delphi method, we conducted a research study with an expert panel of 284 participants from 31 European countries, collecting quantitative and qualitative data. We tested ten future-oriented projections and gathered insights on participants’ backgrounds and attitudes towards ATs for this demographic. To enhance representation, experts from academia, service providers, industry, and disability organizations, as well as individuals with disabilities and their families, were included. Although the findings show strong consensus among experts on the positive impact and desirability of ATs for promoting the social inclusion of people with intellectual disabilities and autistic individuals, they also reveal differing perceptions across expert groups and identify two distinct future scenarios linked to different cultural, social, and economic hindrances. In this sense, our study provides diverse global perspectives, with the potential to help governing bodies understand the expectations, concerns, and needs related to ATs for often underrepresented groups–people with intellectual disabilities and autistic individuals in this case.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Disabilities
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/disabilities4040071
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Delphi Technique in Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

International Perspectives on Assistive Technologies for Autism and Intellectual Disabilities: Findings from a Delphi Study

Branislav Gerazov, May Agius, Tomasz Przybyła, Merita Hoxha et al.
7 citations
Disabilities
Delphi Technique in Research
7.92
article

International Perspectives on Assistive Technologies for Autism and Intellectual Disabilities: Findings from a Delphi Study

Branislav Gerazov, May Agius, Tomasz Przybyła, Merita Hoxha, Paulina Tsvetkova, Alan H. Tkaczyk, Daniel Beiderbeck, Aneta Maria Kochanowicz, Carla Sousa
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Advancements in Assistive Technologies (ATs) have significantly improved the quality of life and autonomy for people with intellectual disabilities and autistic individuals, enhancing education, social interaction, employment, and mental health. Nevertheless, several barriers still emerge in the daily implementation of such technologies, highlighting the need to explore them in depth. Using a two-round Delphi method, we conducted a research study with an expert panel of 284 participants from 31 European countries, collecting quantitative and qualitative data. We tested ten future-oriented projections and gathered insights on participants’ backgrounds and attitudes towards ATs for this demographic. To enhance representation, experts from academia, service providers, industry, and disability organizations, as well as individuals with disabilities and their families, were included. Although the findings show strong consensus among experts on the positive impact and desirability of ATs for promoting the social inclusion of people with intellectual disabilities and autistic individuals, they also reveal differing perceptions across expert groups and identify two distinct future scenarios linked to different cultural, social, and economic hindrances. In this sense, our study provides diverse global perspectives, with the potential to help governing bodies understand the expectations, concerns, and needs related to ATs for often underrepresented groups–people with intellectual disabilities and autistic individuals in this case.

DisabilitiesVol. 4(4)
University of Library Studies and Information Technologies (BG), University of Malta (MT), Bulgarian Academy of Sciences (BG), University of Elbasan (AL), WSB University (PL), University of Tartu (EE), Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań (PL), Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje (MK), WHU – Otto Beisheim School of Management (DE), Universidade Lusófona (PT)
European Cooperation in Science and Technology, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Delphi Technique in Research
7.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.