Predicting uptake and elimination kinetics of chemicals in invertebrates: A technical note on residual variance modeling

Toxicokinetic models for predicting contents of nanomaterials and other toxic chemicals are often fitted without evaluation of the residual variance structure. The aim of the present study was to evaluate various residual variance structures, assuming either homoscedasticity or heteroscedasticity, when fitting non-linear toxicokinetic one-compartment models for predicting uptake, bioaccumulation and elimination of chemicals in invertebrate organisms. Data describing the exposure of several aquatic and terrestrial invertebrates to specific metal nanomaterials and other chemicals were available from real experiments for evaluating the residual variance functions for toxicokinetic models. As proof of concept, datasets of truly homoscedastic and heteroscedastic nature were simulated. Depending the dataset, applying models with different residuals variance assumption largely affected the residual plots and the error margins of parameters or the predicted content of a chemical. Consequently, selecting the most accurate residual variance functions for toxicokinetic modeling, either homoscedastic or heteroscedastic, improves the prediction of chemical contents in invertebrate organisms and the estimation of the associated uptake and elimination rates. • Residual plots indicate if an accurate model was fitted to the toxicological data. • Choice of residual variance function affects the error margins of predicted chemicals. • Selecting proper residual variance models may prevent false positives and negatives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computational Toxicology
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comtox.2024.100337
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting uptake and elimination kinetics of chemicals in invertebrates: A technical note on residual variance modeling

Marta Baccaro, N.W. van den Brink, Henk J. van Lingen, Edoardo Saccenti et al.
2 citations
Computational Toxicology
Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
0.63
article

Predicting uptake and elimination kinetics of chemicals in invertebrates: A technical note on residual variance modeling

Marta Baccaro, N.W. van den Brink, Henk J. van Lingen, Edoardo Saccenti, María Suárez‐Diez
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Toxicokinetic models for predicting contents of nanomaterials and other toxic chemicals are often fitted without evaluation of the residual variance structure. The aim of the present study was to evaluate various residual variance structures, assuming either homoscedasticity or heteroscedasticity, when fitting non-linear toxicokinetic one-compartment models for predicting uptake, bioaccumulation and elimination of chemicals in invertebrate organisms. Data describing the exposure of several aquatic and terrestrial invertebrates to specific metal nanomaterials and other chemicals were available from real experiments for evaluating the residual variance functions for toxicokinetic models. As proof of concept, datasets of truly homoscedastic and heteroscedastic nature were simulated. Depending the dataset, applying models with different residuals variance assumption largely affected the residual plots and the error margins of parameters or the predicted content of a chemical. Consequently, selecting the most accurate residual variance functions for toxicokinetic modeling, either homoscedastic or heteroscedastic, improves the prediction of chemical contents in invertebrate organisms and the estimation of the associated uptake and elimination rates. • Residual plots indicate if an accurate model was fitted to the toxicological data. • Choice of residual variance function affects the error margins of predicted chemicals. • Selecting proper residual variance models may prevent false positives and negatives.

Computational ToxicologyVol. 33
Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme, Horizon 2020
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
0.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.