The maintenance of genetic polymorphism underlying sexually antagonistic traits

Selection often favors different trait values in males and females, leading to genetic conflicts between the sexes when traits have a shared genetic basis. Such sexual antagonism has been proposed to maintain genetic polymorphism. However, this notion is based on insights from population genetic models of single loci with fixed fitness effects. It is thus unclear how readily polymorphism emerges from sex-specific selection acting on continuous traits, where fitness effects arise from the genotype-phenotype map and the fitness landscape. Here, we model the evolution of a continuous trait that has a shared genetic basis but different optima in males and females, considering a wide variety of genetic architectures and fitness landscapes. For autosomal loci, the long-term maintenance of polymorphism requires strong conflict between males and females that generates uncharacteristic sex-specific fitness patterns. Instead, more plausible sex-specific fitness landscapes typically generate stabilizing selection leading to an evolutionarily stable state that consists of a single homozygous genotype. Except for sites tightly linked to the sex-determining region, our results indicate that genetic variation due to sexual antagonism should arise only rarely and often be transient, making these signatures challenging to detect in genomic data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Evolution Letters
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/evlett/qrae059
Citations
15
Primary Topic
Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.25

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The maintenance of genetic polymorphism underlying sexually antagonistic traits

Max Reuter, Ewan O. Flintham, Vincent Savolainen, Charles Mullon et al.
15 citations
Evolution Letters
Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
8.25
article

The maintenance of genetic polymorphism underlying sexually antagonistic traits

Max Reuter, Ewan O. Flintham, Vincent Savolainen, Charles Mullon, Sarah Perin Otto
article en
15 citations

Abstract

Selection often favors different trait values in males and females, leading to genetic conflicts between the sexes when traits have a shared genetic basis. Such sexual antagonism has been proposed to maintain genetic polymorphism. However, this notion is based on insights from population genetic models of single loci with fixed fitness effects. It is thus unclear how readily polymorphism emerges from sex-specific selection acting on continuous traits, where fitness effects arise from the genotype-phenotype map and the fitness landscape. Here, we model the evolution of a continuous trait that has a shared genetic basis but different optima in males and females, considering a wide variety of genetic architectures and fitness landscapes. For autosomal loci, the long-term maintenance of polymorphism requires strong conflict between males and females that generates uncharacteristic sex-specific fitness patterns. Instead, more plausible sex-specific fitness landscapes typically generate stabilizing selection leading to an evolutionarily stable state that consists of a single homozygous genotype. Except for sites tightly linked to the sex-determining region, our results indicate that genetic variation due to sexual antagonism should arise only rarely and often be transient, making these signatures challenging to detect in genomic data.

Evolution LettersVol. 9(2)
University of British Columbia (CA), University College London (GB), Imperial College London (GB), University of Lausanne (CH)
National Science Foundation, Leverhulme Trust, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Directorate for Biological Sciences, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, Natural Environment Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
8.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.